Teams

GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Fernandez)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings8 teams · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Bordier/Adult 18 & over/2.5W9125516186
2GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Castaneda))(EPCC#1)73191124229
3GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Fernandez)(EPTC#1)64171331261
4GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Jabor)(EPCC#2)55141637291
5GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Porras)(CCC)55141637299
6GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Hufft)(FB)37121838279
7GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Schaefer)(EPTC#4)37111941301
8GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Miranda)(EPTC#3)2882246303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Belinda Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 21% · published 3.5
2.34
Cristina Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 2.5
2.33
Diana M Perez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 2.5
2.11
Cecilia Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
Iva Ivanova
published
Mara Talamantes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Montzerrat Alvarado
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Norma Alvarado
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Viviana Marquez
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published
Zaira Delgado
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina Gonzalez + Viviana Marquez3253% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Delgado + Diana M Perez3255% gamesnot enough data
Norma Alvarado + Cristina Gonzalez314 matchesnot enough data
Cristina Gonzalez + Cecilia Delgado224 matchesnot enough data
Cristina Gonzalez + Mara Talamantes224 matchesnot enough data
Montzerrat Alvarado + Mara Talamantes044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Belinda Fernandez
54W–62L career · type A · 33 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
2.5
Cristina Gonzalez
32W–31L career · 14 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Diana M Perez
10W–19L career · 18 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Cecilia Delgado
27W–43L career · 33 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Iva Ivanova
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mara Talamantes
12W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Montzerrat Alvarado
3W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Norma Alvarado
20W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Viviana Marquez
17W–18L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zaira Delgado
54W–34L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.