Teams

GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Castaneda))(EPCC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 2.60 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings8 teams · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Bordier/Adult 18 & over/2.5W9125516186
2GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Castaneda))(EPCC#1)73191124229
3GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Fernandez)(EPTC#1)64171331261
4GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Jabor)(EPCC#2)55141637291
5GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Porras)(CCC)55141637299
6GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Hufft)(FB)37121838279
7GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Schaefer)(EPTC#4)37111941301
8GEPTA-2.5-Adult/18+W(Miranda)(EPTC#3)2882246303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Alejandra Beltran
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.35
Brianda Van
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Daniela Minjares
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.24
Christine Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
1.91
Analisa Cordova
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Erika Castaneda
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Gabriela Navarro
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published
Georgina Garcia
published
Jessica Bordier
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Kimberly Frank
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Nydia Correa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stacey Schaber
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Victoria Dominguez
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Yadira Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Dominguez + Stacey Schaber15951% gamesnot enough data
Brianda Van + Gabriela Navarro3549% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Dominguez + Alejandra Beltran3254% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Dominguez + Christine Gomez224 matchesnot enough data
Victoria Dominguez + Kimberly Frank404 matchesnot enough data
Nydia Correa + Christine Gomez134 matchesnot enough data
Gabriela Navarro + Daniela Minjares224 matchesnot enough data
Brianda Van + Analisa Cordova123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alejandra Beltran
14W–7L career · 10 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
2.5
Brianda Van
21W–27L career · 16 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Daniela Minjares
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Christine Gomez
19W–30L career · 21 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Analisa Cordova
7W–26L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Erika Castaneda
32W–39L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gabriela Navarro
32W–21L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Georgina Garcia
7W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Bordier
36W–9L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Frank
34W–6L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nydia Correa
9W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Schaber
25W–17L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Dominguez
34W–31L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yadira Gonzalez
25W–23L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.