Teams

Sh.Agresta18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-08vs Al.Crumpler18CSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJennifer Holloman / Kimberly Walker vs Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger / Kate Whitney6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesIlona Peszlen / Sharon Agresta vs Julia Perkins / Anne Elizabeth Harrell3-6, 1-6
2024-10-01vs Ki.Johnson18C7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Hunter / Ilona Peszlen vs Sandy Wood / Caroline Fungaroli2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-30vs La.Ross18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Holloman / Kimberly Walker vs Yuwie Hager / Laura Ross3-6, 1-6
2024-09-10vs Al.Sheehan18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Holloman / Sindee Simon vs Alvina Oelhafen / Mary Dee Smith5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-03vs Ma.Schantz18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Garnier / Julie Fleming vs Noelle Jackson / Grace McPherson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-27vs Da.Driscoll18CLost 02
L#2 DoublesIlona Peszlen / Kimberly Walker vs Daphne Driscoll / Nancy Gugliotta2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Holloman / Shannon Phillips vs Susan Flanagan / Susan Hembarsky4-6, 4-6
2024-08-20vs Al.Crumpler18CLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Holloman / Sindee Simon vs Jenna Huggins / Jeanie White4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesIlona Peszlen / Sue Norcia vs Allison Crumpler / Sharon Baggett0-6, 3-4
2024-08-13vs Ki.Johnson18C7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Fleming / Jennifer Holloman vs Sandy Wood / Caroline Fungaroli6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Christina Jenkins
published 3.5
3.76
Celeste Ramsey
published 4
3.68
Jane Hunter
published
3.57
Jennifer Holloman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.45
Ilona Peszlen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Kathy Garnier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Sharon Agresta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Agresta + Jennifer Holloman6546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Jenkins
34W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.82
4
Celeste Ramsey
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Jane Hunter
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Jennifer Holloman
193W–92L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Ilona Peszlen
89W–101L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Kathy Garnier
16W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Sharon Agresta
39W–51L career · 1 line in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.