Teams

CDTA E 18&OM5.0 1MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5

CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Men 5.0

6 players · average NTRP 5.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesJared Dorfman / Christopher Tkach vs Guillermo Gomez / Griffin Calkins6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMax Crouse vs Andris Gudins3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMike Brown / Paul Gilden vs Brian Utz / Brandon Wozniczka2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJared Dorfman vs Andris Gudins6-1, 7-6
L#1 DoublesAdham Alaily / Jared Dorfman vs Brian Utz / Jay Wagh6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDave Clark / Paul Gilden vs Griffin Calkins / Andris Gudins5-7, 4-6
2025-09-28Split 11
L#1 DoublesJared Dorfman / Christopher Tkach vs Hall Fess / Jay Wagh5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMax Crouse vs Peter Neumer4-6, 5-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesPaul Gilden / Christopher Tkach vs Guillermo Gomez / Russell Needler6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMax Crouse vs Brandon Wozniczka6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CDTA E 18&O Men 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 18&OM5.0 2Tam Needler Sun 7 $22339920150
2CDTA E 18&OM5.0 1MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.53381021165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.70
Jared Dorfman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.54
Christopher Tkach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.51
Paul Gilden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.50
Max Crouse
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Gabriel Inchauste
published
Rick Johnston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Tkach + Jared Dorfman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Dorfman
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.70
5
Christopher Tkach
3W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
Paul Gilden
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.51
Max Crouse
24W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.50
Gabriel Inchauste
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rick Johnston
13W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.