Teams

CDTA E 18&OM5.0 2Tam Needler Sun 7 $22

CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Men 5.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.75 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesRussell Needler / Brian Utz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesGuillermo Gomez / Griffin Calkins vs Jared Dorfman / Christopher Tkach2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAndris Gudins vs Max Crouse6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesBrian Utz / Brandon Wozniczka vs Mike Brown / Paul Gilden6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndris Gudins vs Jared Dorfman1-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesBrian Utz / Jay Wagh vs Adham Alaily / Jared Dorfman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrandon Wozniczka vs Gabriel Inchauste2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGriffin Calkins / Andris Gudins vs Dave Clark / Paul Gilden7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGriffin Calkins / Alexander Gebert vs Adham Alaily / Gabriel Inchauste3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesGuillermo Gomez / Russell Needler vs Paul Gilden / Christopher Tkach3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrandon Wozniczka vs Max Crouse2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CDTA E 18&O Men 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 18&OM5.0 2Tam Needler Sun 7 $22339920150
2CDTA E 18&OM5.0 1MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.53381021165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Andris Gudins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.36
Brandon Wozniczka
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.34
Brian Utz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Griffin Calkins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
Russell Needler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Xavier Aubron
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andris Gudins
11W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Brandon Wozniczka
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.36
4.5
Brian Utz
37W–25L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
4.34
Griffin Calkins
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.22
4.5
Russell Needler
93W–105L career · 6 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.92
Xavier Aubron
12W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.