Teams

KF.Tapp

2025 CTRL Mixed 55 & Over · Mixed 55 & Over 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-03vs KF.GutherieWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephane Daniel / Alice Schoots vs Randy Myers / Debbie Powell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRon Jeffery / Julie Tapp vs Howard Lem / Carole Bobby6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-14vs KF.GutherieSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJulie Tapp / Ron Jeffery vs James Wojcio / Karon Mertens2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlice Schoots / Matthew Pare vs William Miller / Donna Lee6-4, 6-3
2025-07-13vs TOC.ClarkWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Carley / Ron Jeffery vs Morten Pedersen / Michiyo Pedersen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Haire / Stephane Daniel vs Shelly Jude / Daniel McDonald6-2, 6-2
2025-07-01vs KF.GutherieLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Haire / Ron Jeffery vs Lonnie Sroka / James Wojcio4-6, 4-6
2025-06-08vs TOC.ClarkWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Haire / Ron Jeffery vs Sarah Hall / Steve Pigora6-3, 6-2
2025-06-01vs TOC.ClarkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlice Schoots / David Ferris vs Shelly Jude / Daniel McDonald6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Haire / Stephane Daniel vs Sarah Hall / Steve Clark6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 55 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
David Ferris
published 3.5
3.44
Stephane Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Matthew Pare
published
David Sardinha
published 3.5
3.21
Ron Jeffery
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Nancy Haire
published
3.18
Alice Schoots
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Carley
published
3.12
Julie Tapp
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.12
Gauri Johnson
published 3.5
2.98
Hanna Sturgis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kip Sturgis
published
William Pencola
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Ferris
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Stephane Daniel
63W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
Matthew Pare
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
David Sardinha
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ron Jeffery
37W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Nancy Haire
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Alice Schoots
91W–113L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Lisa Carley
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Julie Tapp
118W–134L career · 8 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Gauri Johnson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Hanna Sturgis
82W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Kip Sturgis
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Pencola
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.