Teams

LKulp-SVC

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-22vs SFranks-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMelissa Coward vs Elizabeth Chan3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesTracy Lowrance vs Jennifer Magee6-3, 6-4
2025-11-17Won 20
W#2 SinglesKaren Johnston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTracy Lowrance vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-12vs NDolan-HRWon 10
W#1 SinglesKatie Naftel vs Sara Lawrence6-3, 6-1
2025-11-03vs KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesMelissa Coward vs Ana Goodwin7-5, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Anne Confer6-3, 7-5
L#3 SinglesKatie Naftel vs Kim McWhorter0-6, 3-6
2025-10-20vs GLoFrese-DURLost 01
L#1 SinglesMelissa Coward vs Anna Papadopoulos2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-10-13vs LBible-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Shelly Guo6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesTracy Lowrance vs Kathleen Young6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
3.39
Lauren Kulp
published 3.5
3.38
Laura Worcester
published
3.29
Karen Johnston
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Katie Naftel
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Melissa Coward
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Ashlyn Zebrowski
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.19
Tracy Lowrance
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Ann Flodin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Sudzina Schut + Lauren Kulp7165% games+12.8% vs expected
Lauren Kulp + Karen Johnston5359% games+5.2% vs expected
Christine Sudzina Schut + Melissa Coward13559% games+5.0% vs expected
Tracy Lowrance + Karen Johnston371061% games+4.8% vs expected
Lauren Kulp + Ashlyn Zebrowski3455% games+0.7% vs expected
Katie Naftel + Christine Sudzina Schut5158% games−2.0% vs expected
Lauren Kulp + Tracy Lowrance7363% games−9.0% vs expected
Katie Naftel + Melissa Coward3350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Sudzina Schut
149W–88L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Lauren Kulp
86W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Laura Worcester
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Karen Johnston
260W–107L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Katie Naftel
57W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Melissa Coward
146W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3
Ashlyn Zebrowski
81W–57L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
3.5
Tracy Lowrance
185W–109L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Ann Flodin
65W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.