Teams

Brown K 8.5 Combo 40s Thurs

2023 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 40 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-28vs Milam 8.5 Combo 40s ThursLost 02
L#1 DoublesSallye Parker / Alyssa Mann vs Kelly Lombardino / Caroline McAlister2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMinerva Loran / Shawn McFarlin vs Saundra Westervelt / Jessica Bair-Epps1-6, 5-7
2023-09-14vs Scott/Priest 8.5 Combo 40s ThursLost 01
L#2 DoublesSallye Parker / Minerva Loran vs Susan Henshall / Lynn Chafin7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-01vs Oldis 8.5 Combo 40s thursSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Batts / Shawn McFarlin vs Leigh Ann Oldis / Brenda Willis7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSallye Parker / Pam McAmis vs Marianna Bryce / Paige Cummings0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Mary Batts vs Melissa Goodman / Beverly Tuttle6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-17vs KRUSE 8.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarole Albright / Shawn McFarlin vs Lisa Baker / Trisha Kirby6-1, 6-3
2023-08-10vs Milam 8.5 Combo 40s ThursSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Mann / Sallye Parker vs Roberta Rohan / Kelly Lombardino1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarole Albright / Shawn McFarlin vs Kelly Miller / Suzanne Rudy6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Alyssa Mann
published 4
3.77
Virginia Easley
published
3.71
Carole Albright
published 4
3.69
Pam McAmis
published
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Tammy Dickenson
published
3.54
Minerva Loran
published
3.52
Kathy Hedgecock
published
3.48
Mary Batts
published
3.32
Kathy Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Brown + Tammy Dickenson2449% games−9.6% vs expected
Kathy Brown + Virginia Easley2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Alyssa Mann
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Virginia Easley
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Carole Albright
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Pam McAmis
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 6 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Tammy Dickenson
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kathy Hedgecock
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Mary Batts
30W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
Kathy Brown
14W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.