Teams

Scott/Priest 8.5 Combo 40s Thurs

2023 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 40 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#3 DoublesLibby Strickland / Sheri Romaine vs Bonnie Satterfield / Beverly Tuttle6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-21vs Oldis 8.5 Combo 40s thursWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Helms / Linda Hall vs Beth Harris / Marla Barnwell7-5, 6-4
2023-09-14vs Brown K 8.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Andrea Shafer vs Tammy Dickenson / Virginia Easley7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGwenda Priest / Libby Strickland vs Kathy Brown / Carole Albright7-5, 6-4
2023-08-31vs KRUSE 8.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesSheri Romaine / Linda Hall vs Chris Amos / Penn Grose6-0, 6-2
L#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Susan Henshall vs Jessica Smith / Dabney Porter6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-08-17vs Cartee 8.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Hall / Andrea Shafer vs Robin Johnson / Heidi Wrisley6-3, 7-5
2023-08-03vs Oldis 8.5 Combo 40s thursLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Helms / Libby Strickland vs Tiffany Brown / Kim Littrell6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Linda Helms
published
4.00
Joanna Scott
published
3.89
Sheri Romaine
published
3.78
Sarah Joplin
published
3.75
Andrea Shafer
published 4
3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Lynn Jacoby
published
3.68
3.56
Lynn Chafin
published
3.54
Gwenda Priest
published 4
3.46
Keevie Martin
published
Linda Hall
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Susan Henshall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Libby Strickland + Linda Hall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Helms
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
Joanna Scott
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
4.00
Sheri Romaine
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.89
Sarah Joplin
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Andrea Shafer
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 9 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Lynn Jacoby
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Adriana Hernandez
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Lynn Chafin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Keevie Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
Linda Hall
100W–71L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Henshall
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.