Teams

Seminole Lake Price

2025 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 W Saturday

17 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-22vs Pinellas/Rodrigues/18&Over3.5WLost 12
L#1 SinglesChristina Carnahan vs Nicky Baumohl7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Remie / Jill MacNeil vs Dori Hazama / Jennifer Casey6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShelley Williams / Lina Chaves vs Nelci Rodrigues / Carrie Kilgroe6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Pinellas/Rodrigues/18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Price / Anne Remie vs Trisha Shirkey / Carrie Kilgroe3-6, 2-6
2025-03-08vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesChristine Campbell / Anne Remie vs Brooke Rosenberg / Danielle Coke6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMonica Barkett vs Marta Russick6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesVera Reutova vs Monika Hazners6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLina Chaves / Shelley Williams vs Jennifer Gibson / Meg DeSomery6-2, 6-2
2025-03-01vs Ardea BraudisWon 20
W#2 DoublesLina Chaves / Shelley Williams vs Gail Stallwood / Kathleen Annichiarico3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Price / Anne Remie vs Liwen Tao / Martha Cornatzer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-08vs McMullen Ebony & IvoryWon 20
W#1 SinglesMonica Barkett vs Eileen Rodriguez6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Price / Christine Campbell vs Tricia Lolkus / Joan Whitten6-3, 6-3
2025-02-05vs McMullen Ebony & IvoryWon 20
W#1 SinglesMonica Barkett vs Tricia Lolkus6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristina Carnahan / Lina Chaves vs LaMonica Lovett / Brianna Arnold6-3, 6-1
2025-02-01vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesChristina Carnahan vs Biatta Malkiewicz7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarol Vitelli / Anne Remie vs Cathrine Chin / Kristi Downs6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-01-18vs Ardea BraudisLost 03
L#2 DoublesAnne Remie / Jill MacNeil vs Kathleen Annichiarico / Karin Hartenbach6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChristina Carnahan vs Erin Chenderlin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Price / Dolores Salazar vs Teresa Orr / Lou Reavis3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Monica Barkett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Vera Reutova
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Tamara Tindell
published 3.5
3.44
Jennifer Botelho
published
3.38
Kathleen Betancourt
published
3.30
Brandy Fernandez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Christina Carnahan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Anne Remie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Ruth Barnett
published
3.23
Danielle Haggar
published 3.5
3.23
Carol Vitelli
published 3.5
3.22
Christine Campbell
published 3.5
3.20
Jill MacNeil
published
3.18
Lina Chaves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Dolores Salazar
published 3.5
3.13
Sally Blush
published
3.02
Christine Price
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lina Chaves + Christina Carnahan4252% games+7.7% vs expected
Danielle Haggar + Tamara Tindell4160% games−2.0% vs expected
Christine Price + Anne Remie4351% gamesnot enough data
Christine Price + Lina Chaves1536% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Betancourt + Christine Campbell213 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Barnett + Anne Remie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Monica Barkett
239W–135L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Vera Reutova
67W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Tamara Tindell
97W–50L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Jennifer Botelho
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kathleen Betancourt
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Brandy Fernandez
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Christina Carnahan
25W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Anne Remie
136W–73L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Ruth Barnett
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Danielle Haggar
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carol Vitelli
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Christine Campbell
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Jill MacNeil
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lina Chaves
51W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Dolores Salazar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Sally Blush
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christine Price
99W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.