Teams

Enk/40/6.5/COQ

2024 Man · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night

19 players · average NTRP 3.44 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Bridgette Taylor
published 4
3.45
Alecia Seastrunk
published 3.5
3.40
Jamie McWilliams
published 3.5
3.33
Celeste Collins
published 3.5
3.16
Amanda McInnis
published 3.5
3.12
Erin Englert
published 3.5
2.89
Gail Miller
published 3
2.65
Diane Satter
published 3
Janel Tedesco
published
Janine Hodges
published
Jeanne Woodrick
published
Kelly Slimming
published
Kim Kocken
published
Kimberly Darr
published
Merritt Edwards
published
Michelle Pecoraro
published
Shannon Enk
published
Tracey Kern
published
Violeta Daskalova
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merritt Edwards + Shannon Enk6358% gamesnot enough data
Bridgette Taylor + Celeste Collins2447% gamesnot enough data
Gail Miller + Diane Satter1440% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Pecoraro + Celeste Collins2343% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Darr + Kelly Slimming2346% gamesnot enough data
Erin Englert + Amanda McInnis2342% gamesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Bridgette Taylor134 matchesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Celeste Collins314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridgette Taylor
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Alecia Seastrunk
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Jamie McWilliams
33W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Celeste Collins
33W–32L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Amanda McInnis
21W–14L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Erin Englert
30W–21L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Gail Miller
31W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Diane Satter
12W–27L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Janel Tedesco
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janine Hodges
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeanne Woodrick
12W–24L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
47W–42L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Kocken
37W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberly Darr
53W–29L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Merritt Edwards
31W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Pecoraro
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shannon Enk
52W–32L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracey Kern
18W–23L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Violeta Daskalova
37W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.