Teams

PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CW7.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 7.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Nga Truong
published
3.66
Janie McCauley
published
3.63
Trang Hoang
published
3.59
Vivian Reiser
published
3.57
Tuesdai Powers
published
3.53
Michelle Dayco
published
3.53
Rachel Falk
published
3.48
Margie Moran
published
3.43
Sanna Garcia
published
3.33
Jessica Vasisht
published
3.32
Rattana Graff
published
3.30
Anna Le
published 3.5
3.30
Sahana Iyer
published
3.28
Janet Race
published
3.25
Nancy Blom
published
3.21
Cathy Althoff
published 3.5
3.14
Kris Courtney
published
3.06
Florence Huang
published
3.04
Danielle Willis
published 3.5
3.00
Gayle Millington
published
2.93
Daljeet Singh
published 3.5
Mary Akli
published
Mayra Dominguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sanna Garcia + Jessica Vasisht4256% games−2.4% vs expected
Nancy Blom + Cathy Althoff5646% games−6.6% vs expected
Daljeet Singh + Sanna Garcia044 matchesnot enough data
Janie McCauley + Margie Moran213 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Blom + Gayle Millington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nga Truong
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Janie McCauley
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Trang Hoang
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Vivian Reiser
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Tuesdai Powers
24W–30L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Michelle Dayco
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.53
Rachel Falk
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Margie Moran
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Sanna Garcia
13W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jessica Vasisht
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Rattana Graff
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.32
3.5
Anna Le
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Sahana Iyer
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.30
Janet Race
9W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Nancy Blom
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cathy Althoff
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Kris Courtney
15W–20L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Florence Huang
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Danielle Willis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Gayle Millington
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Daljeet Singh
3W–25L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
Mary Akli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mayra Dominguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.