Teams

OSTC - Adamo

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-18vs BBTC - FitzgeraldSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKelly Pilger vs Kathleen Fitzgerald4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHeather Wagner vs Wendy Ray2-6, 0-6
2024-12-17vs BBTC - FitzgeraldSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKara Blevins vs Kathleen Fitzgerald6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAngela Vo vs Linda Creel2-6, 3-6
2024-11-21vs BBTC - FitzgeraldSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Linda Creel6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesCrystal Harper vs Lauren Patin3-6, 3-6
2024-11-20vs TOCC 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Hannah Hults6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDelaney Adamo vs Molly Pittman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-14vs TOCC 3.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesDelaney Adamo vs Stacie Zorn6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesHeather Wagner vs Sue Battaile0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Kimberly Adams6-0, 6-0
2024-10-24vs TOCC 3.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesDelaney Adamo vs Stacie Zorn7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Kimberly Adams6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kelsey Martin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Crystal Harper
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Kara Blevins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Delaney Adamo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Kelly Pilger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.78
Jodi Radius
published
2.66
Angela Vo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.44
Heather Wagner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Blevins + Jodi Radius6454% games+4.4% vs expected
Angela Vo + Delaney Adamo2450% games−2.3% vs expected
Jodi Radius + Kelly Pilger134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsey Martin
19W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Crystal Harper
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kara Blevins
56W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.12
3.5
Delaney Adamo
20W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Kelly Pilger
39W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jodi Radius
24W–27L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Angela Vo
20W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Heather Wagner
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.