Teams

BBTC - Fitzgerald

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-18vs OSTC - AdamoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKathleen Fitzgerald vs Kelly Pilger6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesWendy Ray vs Heather Wagner6-2, 6-0
2024-12-17vs OSTC - AdamoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKathleen Fitzgerald vs Kara Blevins4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesLinda Creel vs Angela Vo6-2, 6-3
2024-12-04vs TOCC 3.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesKathleen Fitzgerald vs Jennifer Maisano0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAmber Juraszek vs Penny Westfaul5-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesWendy Ray vs Kimberly Adams4-6, 4-6
2024-12-03vs TOCC 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKathleen Fitzgerald vs Sue Battaile1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesWendy Ray vs Hannah Hults2-6, 4-6
2024-11-21vs OSTC - AdamoWon 21
W#1 SinglesCarly Nichols Coy vs Ashley Wilson6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLinda Creel vs Kelsey Martin1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesLauren Patin vs Crystal Harper6-3, 6-3
2024-10-23vs TOCC 3.5Lost 12
W#1 SinglesCarly Nichols Coy vs Jennifer Maisano6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAmber Juraszek vs Sue Battaile3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLinda Creel vs Penny Westfaul6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Carly Nichols Coy
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4
3.10
Lauren Patin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.00
Kathleen Fitzgerald
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Wendy Ray
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.95
Amber Juraszek
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Linda Creel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Patin + Wendy Ray4154% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Ray + Amber Juraszek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carly Nichols Coy
33W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Lauren Patin
43W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.10
Kathleen Fitzgerald
9W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Wendy Ray
39W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3.5
Amber Juraszek
30W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
Linda Creel
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.