Teams

MILL VALLEY 40AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-15vs GLTF/SAN FRAN ST U 40AM4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesWalter Martin / Chris Oconnor vs Qui Nguyen / Thepadol Chaturaphanich2-6, 4-6
2025-01-16vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 40AM4.0BWon 10
W#3 DoublesChris Oconnor / Niraj Javeri vs Steve Nugent / Chris Rosenlund6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Benjamin Moglen
published 4
3.81
Roark Vandien
published
3.81
Bill Graham
published 4
3.74
Charley Hoefer
published 4
3.70
Nick Bockh
published
3.68
Markus Kraemling
published
3.66
Jonathan Rutchik
published
3.65
Aaron Klink
published 4
3.65
Chris Oconnor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Nico Safrit
published
3.60
Scott Dalton
published
3.57
Israel Rosales
published
3.54
Joe Boswell
published
3.49
Brian Weisman
published 4
3.29
Todd Niedermeyer
published
Ben Crosswell
published 3.5
John Yearout
published
Lane Shackleton
published
Lucas Hatch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Israel Rosales + Scott Dalton044 matchesnot enough data
Nico Safrit + Bill Graham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Moglen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
Roark Vandien
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Bill Graham
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Charley Hoefer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Nick Bockh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
Markus Kraemling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Jonathan Rutchik
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Aaron Klink
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
4
Chris Oconnor
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Nico Safrit
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Scott Dalton
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Israel Rosales
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Joe Boswell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
4
Brian Weisman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Todd Niedermeyer
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Ben Crosswell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Yearout
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lane Shackleton
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lucas Hatch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.