Teams

MADEIRA CANYON PARK

2026 TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER LEAGUE 3.0 · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-25vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1Won 30
W#1 DoublesMaria Allen / Jessica Borghoff vs Kimberly Lippisch / Ningyi Zheng6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Austin / Lori LaBarbera vs Jane Doe / Marilyn Fenn7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChloe Dilling / Elizabeth Barnes vs Shani Ma / Cynthia Graham6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-18vs DTC #3Won 21
L#1 DoublesKatie Jacobs / Elizabeth Barnes vs Lisa Ross / Jenny Grob4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Gumm / Nichole Averett vs Christi Lin / Lisa Krzyzaniak6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicole Austin / Jessica Borghoff vs Natasha Kattau / NANCIE WEBSTER6-4, 6-1
2026-08-11vs DTC #1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLori LaBarbera / Chloe Dilling vs Tami Vannah / Desiree Kathmann2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Courville / Melanie Isbell vs Seda Sargsyan / Megan Bell0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Austin / Maria Allen vs Leticia Schoff / Yarisbel Schieck3-6, 1-6
2026-08-04vs TPC #2Won 21
L#1 DoublesKatie Jacobs / Lori LaBarbera vs Teddy Stantcheva / Karin de Amicis0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNichole Averett / Melanie Isbell vs Jennifer Hall / Laura Larsen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Allen / Abigail Cox vs Jeralyn Marchesi / Christina Smith6-3, 6-4
2026-07-28vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Allen / Abigail Cox vs Lisa Schnitz / Maria Lowry4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-21vs ANTHEM CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Covington / Elizabeth Barnes vs Annie Guiliano / Heather George4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Chamberlain / Lori LaBarbera vs Darlene Whittlesy / Lyndsey van der Laan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Borghoff / Nicole Austin vs ANN MARIE WEAVER / CHRISTINE McNair6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-14vs DTC #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Austin / Jessica Borghoff vs Olga Bencini / Meryll Ledesma2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Gumm / Melanie Isbell vs Alexandra Song / Shellene Goudge6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Covington / Katie Jacobs vs LOURDES MENDOZA / Carli Fettig4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TPC #14093780
2MADEIRA CANYON PARK236922163
3TPC #21451021144

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Chloe Dilling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Jennifer Covington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
3.47
Anne Gumm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Katie Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Jacqueline Roberts
published
3.29
Melanie Isbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Lori LaBarbera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Nichole Averett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Emily Courville
published 3.5
3.12
Abigail Cox
published 3
3.09
Maria Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Jessica Borghoff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.99
Nicole Austin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Elizabeth Barnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abigail Cox + Jessica Borghoff17462% games+11.8% vs expected
Lori LaBarbera + Jennifer Covington10457% games+4.3% vs expected
Lori LaBarbera + Chloe Dilling3254% games+1.3% vs expected
Nicole Austin + Jessica Borghoff6253% games+1.3% vs expected
Anne Gumm + Lori LaBarbera2544% games−9.0% vs expected
Chloe Dilling + Jennifer Covington3260% gamesnot enough data
Abigail Cox + Maria Allen404 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Austin + Nichole Averett134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chloe Dilling
84W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Jennifer Covington
124W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Kathleen Chamberlain
104W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Anne Gumm
67W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Katie Jacobs
53W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jacqueline Roberts
74W–45L career · no lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.34
Melanie Isbell
20W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Lori LaBarbera
140W–119L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Nichole Averett
68W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Emily Courville
73W–99L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Abigail Cox
47W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.12
Maria Allen
41W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Jessica Borghoff
104W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Nicole Austin
79W–77L career · 5 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Elizabeth Barnes
33W–72L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.