Teams

Hinchey 3.5 Tatum 18+

2023 Adult 18&Over-PB · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Tina Boykin
published
3.40
Brooke Stuart
published 3.5
3.18
Nema Hinchey
published
3.15
Pam Shearer
published
2.89
Carol Jackson
published 3
2.75
Susan Lott
published
Danielle Dean
published 3
Haley Shook
published 3
2.60
Bettie Collins
published 3
2.42
Sheryle Coaker
published
Michelle Flores
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Shearer + Tina Boykin6083% games+25.5% vs expected
Bettie Collins + Carol Jackson3747% games+4.2% vs expected
Nema Hinchey + Bettie Collins1432% gamesnot enough data
Pam Shearer + Michelle Flores134 matchesnot enough data
Nema Hinchey + Michelle Flores044 matchesnot enough data
Tina Boykin + Brooke Stuart303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Boykin
88W–37L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Brooke Stuart
50W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
Nema Hinchey
16W–37L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Pam Shearer
76W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.15
3
Carol Jackson
15W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.89
Susan Lott
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Danielle Dean
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Haley Shook
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Bettie Collins
18W–48L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Sheryle Coaker
6W–22L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.42
Michelle Flores
12W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.