Teams

Ossining String Quartets

2022 65&Over Women · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-24vs New Rochelle Racquet ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Schwartz / Shang Guo vs Joan Druker / Ellin Greenstein1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeanne Pollock / Nancy Connors vs Susan Belardino / Frances Magrino2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Kaplan / Joan Weinstein vs Barbara Barber / Judy Robinson1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMona Zeliger / Jeanne Pollock vs Patricia Robbins / Anita Reisdorf6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Schwartz / Shang Guo vs Bernice Tracey / Kathleen Fernald6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Connors / Margaret DeFonce vs Gladys DiSisto / Deborah Weiss2-6, 3-6
2022-08-11vs Tennis Club of HastingsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMona Zeliger / Jeanne Pollock vs Catherine Mulhern / BARBARA SCHUMAN3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesWanda Orton / Katherine Schwartz vs Judith Hirsch / Diane Schubert6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoan Weinstein / Lesley San Marco vs Annie Merola / Carol Troy6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJoan Weinstein / Diane Kaplan vs Mary Lofaso / Thuy Tran-Quinn4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarieange Brunnemann / Nancy Connors vs Anita Reisdorf / Bernice Tracey4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLesley San Marco / Margaret DeFonce vs Gladys DiSisto / Susan Halper2-6, 3-6
2022-07-14vs CRRC: The SenioritasWon 30
W#1 DoublesMona Zeliger / Katherine Schwartz vs Erica Linthorst / Roberta Kirshbaum6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Kaplan / Marieange Brunnemann vs Pamela Suett / Roseann Jackette6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Connors / Margaret DeFonce vs Susan Schrift / Francine Falk-Ross3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-23vs New Rochelle Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesMona Zeliger / Jeanne Pollock vs Joan Druker / Linda Negrin6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWanda Orton / Katherine Schwartz vs Elizabeth Halen / Nancy Johnson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarieange Brunnemann / Margaret DeFonce vs Frances Magrino / Judy Robinson6-2, 7-5
2022-06-16vs Tennis Club of HastingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMona Zeliger / Jeanne Pollock vs Janice Shepps / Catherine Mulhern7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Kaplan / Joan Weinstein vs Judith Hirsch / Susan Moscou4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLesley San Marco / Marieange Brunnemann vs Juliet Sitaram-Milo / Karen Weidner6-3, 6-3
2022-06-11vs CRRC: The SenioritasLost 12
L#1 DoublesMona Zeliger / Katherine Schwartz vs Hisako Foster / Erica Linthorst6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Connors / Jeanne Pollock vs Janet Robinson / Sandra Capifali5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Benevento / Lesley San Marco vs Pamela Suett / Susan Schrift6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: Club Fit Briarcliff: All Stars0819510150
2Ossining String Quartets08131126208
3New Rochelle Racquet Club08111329207
4CRRC: The Senioritas08111331235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Mona Zeliger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Shang Guo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Diane Kaplan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jeanne Pollock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joan Weinstein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Katherine Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Lesley San Marco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret DeFonce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marieange Brunnemann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Benevento
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Connors
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Wanda Orton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mona Zeliger + Katherine Schwartz5356% gamesnot enough data
Marieange Brunnemann + Diane Kaplan3354% gamesnot enough data
Jeanne Pollock + Mona Zeliger3260% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Connors + Lesley San Marco1442% gamesnot enough data
Margaret DeFonce + Marieange Brunnemann5063% gamesnot enough data
Lesley San Marco + Nancy Benevento1435% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Connors + Margaret DeFonce224 matchesnot enough data
Marieange Brunnemann + Lesley San Marco224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mona Zeliger
32W–23L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shang Guo
63W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Diane Kaplan
31W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Jeanne Pollock
16W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joan Weinstein
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Katherine Schwartz
27W–34L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lesley San Marco
14W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret DeFonce
15W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marieange Brunnemann
21W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Benevento
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Connors
8W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wanda Orton
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.