Teams

New Rochelle Racquet Club

2022 65&Over Women · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-24vs Ossining String QuartetsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoan Druker / Ellin Greenstein vs Katherine Schwartz / Shang Guo6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Belardino / Frances Magrino vs Jeanne Pollock / Nancy Connors6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Barber / Judy Robinson vs Diane Kaplan / Joan Weinstein6-1, 6-3
2022-08-15vs CRRC: The SenioritasLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Druker / Ellin Greenstein vs Hisako Foster / Elke Betley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Lefleur / Shari Mae Schwarz vs Janet Robinson / Sandra Capifali6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBarbara Barber / Judy Robinson vs Barbara Worms / Roberta Kirshbaum3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesEllin Greenstein / Nancy Johnson vs Mary Lofaso / Patricia Robbins2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Negrin / Judy Robinson vs Gladys DiSisto / Susan Halper1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Lefleur / Shari Mae Schwarz vs Margo Stever / Beth Zolkind2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-09vs CRRC: The SenioritasLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Belardino / Elizabeth Halen vs Satsuki Miyamoto / Erica Linthorst4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Robinson / Linda Negrin vs Pamela Suett / Sandra Capifali6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesFrances Magrino / Jill Robertson vs Barbara Worms / Roberta Kirshbaum3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-23vs Ossining String QuartetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Druker / Linda Negrin vs Mona Zeliger / Jeanne Pollock1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Halen / Nancy Johnson vs Wanda Orton / Katherine Schwartz6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFrances Magrino / Judy Robinson vs Marieange Brunnemann / Margaret DeFonce2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesNancy Johnson / Susan Belardino vs Cathy Cuozzo / Joyce Patone3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Negrin / Joan Druker vs Mary Lofaso / Bernice Tracey3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Barber / Elizabeth Halen vs Susan Halper / Gladys DiSisto2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: Club Fit Briarcliff: All Stars0819510150
2Ossining String Quartets08131126208
3New Rochelle Racquet Club08111329207
4CRRC: The Senioritas08111331235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Ellin Greenstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Frances Magrino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.13
Elizabeth Halen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Barbara Barber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Lefleur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jill Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joan Druker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Linda Negrin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Martha Kaufman
published
Shari Mae Schwarz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Belardino
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Robinson + Ellin Greenstein2442% gamesnot enough data
Frances Magrino + Linda Negrin1536% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Lefleur + Shari Mae Schwarz4157% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Barber + Judy Robinson2352% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Halen + Barbara Barber033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Halen + Joan Druker123 matchesnot enough data
Judy Robinson + Linda Negrin123 matchesnot enough data
Judy Robinson + Joan Druker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Ellin Greenstein
8W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Frances Magrino
78W–129L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Elizabeth Halen
20W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Barbara Barber
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Barbara Lefleur
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jill Robertson
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Joan Druker
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Robinson
7W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Negrin
13W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Kaufman
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shari Mae Schwarz
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Belardino
20W–35L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.