Teams

LT BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-28vs HMTC YELLOWLost 02
L#2 DoublesAmy Berkner / Kim Phillips vs Elina George / Mitzi Johnson5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLynn Arenson vs Kaili Young5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-05-14vs MEA PURPLEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJenna Milliman / Amy Berkner vs Nicole Gonzalez Cruz / Jeanne Cleveland7-6, 7-6
2024-05-07vs LAC PURPLELost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Phillips / Amy Berkner vs Annie Richardson / Lynn Schulte6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-30vs BCC YELLOWLost 01
L#2 SinglesLynn Arenson vs Kristen Ford5-7, 3-6
2024-04-23vs RCC REDWon 20
W#2 SinglesLynn Arenson vs Emily Pedersen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Phillips / Amy Berkner vs Denise Belk / Sara Palmer6-0, 7-6
2024-04-16vs LVTA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Gray / Amy Berkner vs Sarah Lodewick / Caryl Abeyta3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim Phillips / Lynn Arenson vs Madissen Allen / Kelly Blanks1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Adeline Robinson
published 5
4.25
Jenna Milliman
published
4.11
Amy Berkner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.96
Sara Chan
published
3.83
Lynn Arenson
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Kim Phillips
published
3.78
Andrea Motley
published 4.5
3.15
Tina Gray
published
Jennifer Fields
published
Susan Boyle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Arenson + Kim Phillips3548% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Adeline Robinson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.86
Jenna Milliman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Amy Berkner
100W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Sara Chan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.96
4
Lynn Arenson
84W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
Kim Phillips
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4.5
Andrea Motley
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.78
Tina Gray
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Jennifer Fields
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Boyle
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.