Teams

BCC YELLOW

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-21vs RCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCat Diehl / Jennifer Munson vs Kristina Brandner / Victoria Tait1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErica Kuhl / Rachael Sparks vs Katie Johnstone / Katharine Kirby2-6, 3-6
2024-05-14vs LVTA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCat Diehl / Jane Catherine Bracken vs Susanna Styve / Emily Sieg3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRachael Sparks / Victoria Scordo vs Rebecca Moritz / Macy Ricketts1-6, 2-6
2024-05-07vs HMTC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesCat Diehl / Erica Kuhl vs Carmen Kilday / Kimberly Tomlinson6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesRachael Sparks vs Carolina Moore1-6, 3-6
2024-04-30vs LT BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Catherine Bracken / Cat Diehl vs Becca Fitzpatrick / Susan Boyle4-6, 4-6
2024-04-23vs MEA PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesCat Diehl / Jane Catherine Bracken vs Nora Harrison / Katie Hawk6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachael Sparks / Victoria Scordo vs Tanya Saarva / Jo Ann Beserra4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-16vs LAC PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesRachael Sparks / Kristen Ford vs Klara Fitzgerald / Julie Miller0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCat Diehl / Jane Catherine Bracken vs Caitlin Cipollo / Annie Richardson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Sarah Schupp
published
4.18
Cat Diehl
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.17
Brigette Paige
published 4.5
4.14
3.89
Susan Crandall
published
3.86
Kristen Ford
published
3.75
Rachael Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Erica Kuhl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cat Diehl + Kristen Ford2348% games−7.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Schupp
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Cat Diehl
53W–20L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Brigette Paige
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
Jane Catherine Bracken
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
Susan Crandall
1W–11L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.89
Kristen Ford
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.86
4
Rachael Sparks
30W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Erica Kuhl
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.