Teams

RN - Smith 4.0 40+

2024 · 2025 MATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 MATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Robert Matson
published
3.86
Eric Wilson
published
3.77
Tim Bergl
published
3.75
Fred Otto
published
3.69
John Carswell
published
3.68
Scott Bedgood
published
3.67
James C Barlow
published
3.65
Frank Seymour
published
3.65
CHRISTOPHER HUNTER
published 3.5
3.58
Mell Merritt
published
3.56
Robert Cordova
published
3.33
Norm Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Ashton Windham
published 3.5
Jarod Lovett
published
Rob Crain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James C Barlow + Eric Wilson6356% games+4.9% vs expected
Scott Bedgood + John Carswell4547% games+1.7% vs expected
Tim Bergl + Scott Bedgood4646% games−2.0% vs expected
Robert Cordova + Tim Bergl123 matchesnot enough data
Tim Bergl + Frank Seymour123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Matson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
Eric Wilson
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Tim Bergl
18W–18L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Fred Otto
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
John Carswell
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Scott Bedgood
24W–29L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
James C Barlow
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Frank Seymour
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
CHRISTOPHER HUNTER
32W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
Mell Merritt
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Robert Cordova
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Norm Pearson
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Ashton Windham
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Jarod Lovett
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rob Crain
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.