Teams

NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: Striegel

NIN SB Mixed 18 & Over · NIN SB MXD 18 & Over 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-27vs NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: HavlishWon 20
W#1 DoublesTim Denniston / Caitlin Sears vs Susan Bartush / Deangelo Baylock6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarmen MacHaraschwili / Aaron Striegel vs Kwanta Wu / Henry Wu6-2, 6-4
2026-03-20vs NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: PontiusLost 12
W#1 DoublesAaron Striegel / Carmen MacHaraschwili vs Jim Willitts / Sarah Nelson7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMatthew Crow / Amanda Gadacz vs Barry Pontius / Catherine Vaerewyck5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYangyi Xu / Tingyu Cheng vs Trudy Wait / Joshua Derse2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-06vs NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: HavlishWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Denniston / Caitlin Sears vs Henry Wu / Kwanta Wu3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoshua George / Lindsay Sojka vs Susan Bartush / Deangelo Baylock6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAaron Striegel / Kasey Buckles vs Catherine Konkle / Dennis Rodriguez6-4, 6-3
2026-02-27vs NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: PontiusSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTim Denniston / Caitlin Sears vs Jim Willitts / Sarah Nelson2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLindsay Sojka / Joshua George vs Rong Tian / Joshua Derse6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-13vs NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: HavlishLost 02
L#1 DoublesAaron Striegel / Kasey Buckles vs Kwanta Wu / Matt Douhan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTingyu Cheng / Yangyi Xu vs Catherine Konkle / Dennis Rodriguez2-6, 1-6
2026-02-06vs NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: PontiusWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Denniston / Caitlin Sears vs Barry Pontius / Catherine Vaerewyck7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAaron Striegel / Melissa Tilley vs Rong Tian / Joshua Derse6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatthew Crow / Terez Hein vs Eric Thomas / Angela Thomas6-0, 6-3
2026-01-23vs NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: HavlishLost 12
W#1 DoublesAaron Striegel / Kasey Buckles vs Robert Maleski / NANCY KIEFT6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAdam Winkel / Melissa Tilley vs Kwanta Wu / Sergei Starchenko5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Crow / Jill Bender vs Susan Bartush / Deangelo Baylock7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-16vs NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: PontiusWon 20
W#2 DoublesTim Denniston / Melissa Tilley vs Rong Tian / Joshua Derse6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatthew Crow / Terez Hein vs Brian Tack / Trudy Wait6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NIN SB MXD 18 & Over 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: Striegel5316818168
2NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: Havlish43101125188
3NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: Pontius2571433218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Aaron Striegel
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Tim Denniston
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.15
Lindsay Sojka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Adam Winkel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.71
Amanda Gadacz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Terez Hein
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.51
Melissa Tilley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Caitlin Sears
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Kasey Buckles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Carmen MacHaraschwili
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.28
Yangyi Xu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Bender
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Denniston + Caitlin Sears314 matchesnot enough data
Aaron Striegel + Kasey Buckles213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aaron Striegel
37W–81L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Tim Denniston
62W–69L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Lindsay Sojka
41W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.15
3.5
Adam Winkel
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
3.06
3
Amanda Gadacz
18W–26L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
Terez Hein
77W–125L career · 8 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.59
Melissa Tilley
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Caitlin Sears
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Kasey Buckles
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.39
2.5
Carmen MacHaraschwili
16W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Yangyi Xu
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
Jill Bender
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.