Teams

BCST GOLD

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-05vs PH BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesGlen Mizenko / Daryl Mussell vs David Wadsworth / Matthew McFall4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesGlen Mizenko / Daryl Mussell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-16vs GR ORANGELost 01
L#1 SinglesGlen Mizenko vs Gabe McFarland2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-08vs CK REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesGlen Mizenko / Daryl Mussell vs Timothy Parker / Joe Martinez4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-25vs KC-RH PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaryl Mussell / Robert Washburn vs John McGowan / Kele Evans6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Benton Smith
published 3.5
3.26
Robert Washburn
published
3.23
Tom Hannigan
published
3.20
Glen Mizenko
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Daryl Mussell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Jonathan Young
published
3.10
Glenn Simon
published
3.09
Jason Akers
published
3.06
Curtis Preston
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Simon + Jason Akers2445% games+2.1% vs expected
Tom Hannigan + Robert Washburn4352% games−0.5% vs expected
Jason Akers + Jonathan Young3442% games−3.0% vs expected
Daryl Mussell + Glen Mizenko142348% games−5.2% vs expected
Glenn Simon + Jonathan Young1537% games−7.2% vs expected
Daryl Mussell + Curtis Preston1437% games−9.0% vs expected
Jonathan Young + Curtis Preston1538% games−12.2% vs expected
Glenn Simon + Glen Mizenko314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Benton Smith
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
Robert Washburn
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
Tom Hannigan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Glen Mizenko
46W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Daryl Mussell
34W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jonathan Young
11W–21L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Glenn Simon
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
Jason Akers
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Curtis Preston
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.