Teams

LTC:Ballboys 55:Friguglietti/Nicoletta

2026 WMA Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Men 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-20vs ETC:Roebelen/MerrillWon 30
W#1 DoublesFrank Friguglietti / Christopher Viale vs George Roebelen / Jorge Messmer6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLavalier Alves / Robert Page vs Michael Warren / Pete Fracasso3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Garde / Frank Mochak vs David Merrill / Jonathan Avery4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKevin LaFlamme / Robert LaPalme vs David Hernandez / Jeff Palmer6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarc LaPierre / John Garde vs Richard Getler / Curtis Hardaway3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Morizio / David Pleet vs Ricardo Metz / Didier Voisin6-4, 6-1
2026-05-31vs ETC:Roebelen/MerrillWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert LaPalme / Kevin LaFlamme vs George Roebelen / Carl Casinghino7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJohn Morizio / David Gordon vs Stephen Gelling / Michael Warren3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Garde / Marc LaPierre vs David Merrill / Peter Judson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKevin LaFlamme / Robert LaPalme vs Curtis Hardaway / Jeff Palmer6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLavalier Alves / John Morizio vs Chris Seaver / Peter Ghitman5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Viale / Frank Mochak vs Ricardo Metz / Duncan Laird6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesFrank Friguglietti / Kevin LaFlamme vs David Hernandez / Jeff Palmer4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert LaPalme / Frank Mochak vs Chris Seaver / Ricardo Metz3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Morizio / Robert Page vs Richard Getler / Didier Voisin0-6, 5-7
2026-03-14vs ETC:Roebelen/MerrillLost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin LaFlamme / Stephen Perry vs Andrew Brydges / David Merrill4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert LaPalme / Lavalier Alves vs George Roebelen / Jorge Messmer0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Pleet / Frank Friguglietti vs Robert Chasen / Michael Warren7-6, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Roebelen/Merrill3371123167
2LTC:Ballboys 55:Friguglietti/Nicoletta2481023179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Frank Friguglietti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Lavalier Alves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
David Gordon
published 3.5
3.25
Kevin LaFlamme
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
John Morizio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Christopher Viale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Stephen Perry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Frank Mochak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Robert Page
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Robert LaPalme
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.94
Marc LaPierre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
John Garde
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
David Pleet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc LaPierre + John Garde6450% games+2.3% vs expected
Stephen Perry + Kevin LaFlamme111053% gamesnot enough data
John Morizio + Robert Page2443% gamesnot enough data
John Morizio + Lavalier Alves4249% gamesnot enough data
Robert LaPalme + Stephen Perry2439% gamesnot enough data
Robert LaPalme + Kevin LaFlamme2447% gamesnot enough data
John Morizio + Robert LaPalme2346% gamesnot enough data
Frank Friguglietti + Frank Mochak3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Frank Friguglietti
44W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Lavalier Alves
53W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
David Gordon
2W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin LaFlamme
26W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
John Morizio
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Christopher Viale
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Stephen Perry
36W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Frank Mochak
11W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Robert Page
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Robert LaPalme
14W–32L career · 7 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
Marc LaPierre
85W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
John Garde
45W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
David Pleet
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.