Teams

SAndrews (Raintree)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-08vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesNiki Koesel vs Lauren Culp6-4, 6-3
2023-07-25vs KCronin (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMeagan Dorst vs Jenny Wilken6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-11vs KJohnson (Sardis)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesNiki Koesel vs Katie Ferry1-6, 2-6
2023-06-27vs CLogar/RBostic (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMeagan Dorst vs Elizabeth Pawlowski6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesNiki Koesel vs Lisa Leake6-1, 6-3
2023-06-06vs RAddison (Park Road)Won 10
W#2 SinglesNiki Koesel vs Mary Claire Brown6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Caroline Cox
published 3.5
3.12
Katie Eggers
published
3.08
Stacy Andrews
published
3.07
Meagan Dorst
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Susan Chandler
published
2.96
Tricia Shaw
published
2.95
Niki Koesel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.82
Margaret Flores
published
2.75
Nicole Love
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Shaw + Katie Eggers5160% games+19.9% vs expected
Niki Koesel + Katie Eggers7357% games+10.9% vs expected
Niki Koesel + Meagan Dorst8558% gamesnot enough data
Niki Koesel + Tricia Shaw5157% gamesnot enough data
Susan Chandler + Tricia Shaw1430% gamesnot enough data
Susan Chandler + Katie Eggers314 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Andrews + Tricia Shaw213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Chandler + Niki Koesel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Cox
13W–27L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Katie Eggers
26W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.12
Stacy Andrews
31W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.08
3.5
Meagan Dorst
32W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Susan Chandler
35W–30L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Tricia Shaw
30W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Niki Koesel
112W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
Margaret Flores
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.82
Nicole Love
29W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.