Teams

Heritage Bay - Beaudet

2021 Collier Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-02vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Aggie Rupert vs Andrea Washak / Connie Johnson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-02-23vs COLLIER - Riverstone - MalletteLost 01
L#1 DoublesDana Sacks / Dana Bursch vs Bailey Lardinois / Carrie Stowell4-6, 3-6
2021-02-02vs COLLIER - Riverstone - MalletteLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Andrea Kansy vs Amanda Mallette / Eileen Valerio4-6, 5-7
2021-01-21vs COLLIER - Riverstone - MalletteLost 01
L#2 DoublesDana Sacks / MOLLY LANE vs Carrie Stowell / Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga6-7, 4-6
2021-01-19vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Planck / Jeanette Thevening vs Gina Adiutori / Brooke Sykes0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana Sacks / Maria Riccio vs Michelle Kaytaz / Megan Homan6-7, 6-7
2021-01-05vs Pelican Bay Park - J. BrownSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Cheryl Planck vs Nicole Cucinella / Karen Hole1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana Sacks / MOLLY LANE vs Tara Porte / Dawn Cyr4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Aggie Rupert
published 4
3.53
Dana Sacks
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Krista Lombardo
published
3.37
3.35
Susie Beaudet
published
3.35
Jill Sanders
published
3.30
Jeanette Thevening
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Dana Bursch
published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Amaya
published
2.76
Andrea Kansy
published 3
Cheryl Planck
published
MOLLY LANE
published
Maria Riccio
published
Terina Korda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Amaya + Krista Lombardo5075% gamesnot enough data
Terina Korda + Katherine MacWilliams123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aggie Rupert
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 4 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
Krista Lombardo
17W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
Katherine MacWilliams
32W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.37
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.35
Jill Sanders
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Jeanette Thevening
144W–70L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dana Bursch
46W–45L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
Jennifer Amaya
25W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Andrea Kansy
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
Cheryl Planck
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
MOLLY LANE
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maria Riccio
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Terina Korda
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.