Teams

Pelican Bay Park - J. Brown

2021 Collier Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-02vs COLLIER - Riverstone - MalletteLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Hole / ALEJANDRA BRAZAO vs Kelly Stein / Eileen Valerio3-6, 1-6
2021-02-23vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Cucinella / Natalie Cortese vs Mia Delk / Michelle Kaytaz6-4, 7-5
2021-02-09vs COLLIER - Riverstone - MalletteLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Nicole Cucinella vs Amanda Mallette / Eileen Valerio3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-02-02vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkLost 02
L#1 DoublesGretchen Landolt / Natalie Cortese vs Andrea Washak / Connie Johnson5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKaren Hole vs Beth Rainey2-6, 4-6
2021-01-26vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Cucinella / Natalie Cortese vs Cheryl Planck / MOLLY LANE6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-01-19vs COLLIER - Riverstone - MalletteWon 10
W#3 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Gretchen Landolt vs Nikki Miller / Karen Tumulty6-4, 6-2
2021-01-12vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkLost 01
L#1 DoublesGretchen Landolt / Karen Hole vs Andrea Washak / Kelly Heintzelman4-6, 3-6
2021-01-05vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Cucinella / Karen Hole vs Jeanette Thevening / Cheryl Planck6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Karen Hole
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.53
Amanda Fowler
published 4
3.52
Natalie Cortese
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.46
Gretchen Landolt
published 4
3.42
Beth Marchi
published 3.5
3.40
Dawn Cyr
published 3.5
3.23
Gabriela Chahwan
published 3.5
3.21
Maristela Battilana
published
Tara Porte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriela Chahwan + Maristela Battilana134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Hole
99W–147L career · 4 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Amanda Fowler
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Natalie Cortese
144W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
3.52
4
Gretchen Landolt
11W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Beth Marchi
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Dawn Cyr
30W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Gabriela Chahwan
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Maristela Battilana
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
Tara Porte
14W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.