CHCC NAVY
2026 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings97 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1DTC ORANGE | 7 | 0 | 5 | 117 |
| 2LEBTC PURPLE | 7 | 0 | 6 | 86 |
| 3CCC ORANGE | 7 | 0 | 7 | 105 |
| 4RRTC NAVY | 7 | 0 | 10 | 121 |
| 5SS-D BLUE | 7 | 0 | 11 | 139 |
| 6FOX RED | 7 | 0 | 12 | 120 |
| 7EM BLUE | 7 | 0 | 12 | 121 |
| 8HG RED | 7 | 0 | 15 | 126 |
| 9GCC YELLOW | 7 | 0 | 16 | 136 |
| 10CCC PINK | 6 | 1 | 10 | 133 |
| 11CPCC YELLOW | 6 | 1 | 11 | 127 |
| 12NJ ORANGE | 6 | 1 | 12 | 114 |
| 13WP-G RED | 6 | 1 | 12 | 131 |
| 14NJ PURPLE | 6 | 1 | 13 | 155 |
| 15BTA-C YELLOW | 6 | 1 | 14 | 136 |
| 16BRMST TEAL | 6 | 1 | 14 | 151 |
| 17BRMST NAVY | 6 | 1 | 15 | 140 |
| 18CACM RED | 6 | 1 | 18 | 161 |
| 19HV PURPLE | 6 | 1 | 19 | 167 |
| 20WP-O BLUE | 5 | 2 | 14 | 139 |
| 21NJ TEAL | 5 | 2 | 15 | 166 |
| 22PH GREEN | 5 | 2 | 16 | 155 |
| 23DTP GREEN | 5 | 2 | 16 | 138 |
| 24BCST BLUE | 5 | 2 | 17 | 156 |
| 25CCV GREEN | 5 | 2 | 18 | 147 |
| 26GNO YELLOW | 5 | 2 | 19 | 169 |
| 27HW GREEN | 5 | 2 | 20 | 168 |
| 28HV GREEN | 5 | 2 | 20 | 151 |
| 29GR BLUE | 5 | 2 | 20 | 172 |
| 30HRCA-N PINK | 5 | 2 | 20 | 199 |
| 31RHCC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 21 | 173 |
| 32RHCC RED | 5 | 2 | 24 | 189 |
| 33KC-RH BLUE | 4 | 3 | 17 | 170 |
| 34WC NAVY | 4 | 3 | 18 | 163 |
| 35HV ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 18 | 150 |
| 36CHCC NAVY | 4 | 3 | 20 | 166 |
| 37WP-O NAVY | 4 | 3 | 20 | 166 |
| 38SS-LT YELLOW | 4 | 3 | 21 | 187 |
| 39CM BLUE | 4 | 3 | 21 | 166 |
| 40BM GREEN | 4 | 3 | 22 | 177 |
| 41DTC RED | 4 | 3 | 22 | 162 |
| 42HRCA-S TEAL | 4 | 3 | 22 | 164 |
| 43WC GREEN | 4 | 3 | 24 | 175 |
| 44GCC ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 25 | 175 |
| 45CM GREEN | 3 | 4 | 19 | 147 |
| 46VC BLUE | 3 | 4 | 21 | 171 |
| 47BP ORANGE | 3 | 4 | 22 | 188 |
| 48SS-G GOLD | 3 | 4 | 22 | 172 |
| 49BCC RED | 3 | 4 | 23 | 171 |
| 50WP-G TEAL | 3 | 4 | 23 | 160 |
| 51CCV RED | 3 | 4 | 24 | 182 |
| 52MVCC GREEN | 3 | 4 | 24 | 194 |
| 53LEBTC RED | 3 | 4 | 25 | 183 |
| 54EM TEAL | 3 | 4 | 25 | 196 |
| 55NJ GREEN | 3 | 4 | 26 | 191 |
| 56SS-LT NAVY | 3 | 4 | 26 | 201 |
| 57CPV BLUE | 3 | 4 | 28 | 206 |
| 58PRKR GREEN | 3 | 4 | 28 | 210 |
| 59COV PINK | 3 | 4 | 28 | 198 |
| 60GAC RED | 3 | 4 | 29 | 211 |
| 61RCC BLUE | 3 | 4 | 30 | 212 |
| 62EM GREEN | 3 | 4 | 32 | 218 |
| 63SS-LT GREEN | 2 | 5 | 24 | 192 |
| 64HG GREEN | 2 | 5 | 25 | 208 |
| 65CVTA TEAL | 2 | 5 | 25 | 185 |
| 66GTC BLUE | 2 | 5 | 25 | 201 |
| 67HW YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 26 | 192 |
| 68MEA GREEN | 2 | 5 | 26 | 198 |
| 69SKY BLUE | 2 | 5 | 27 | 195 |
| 70PTC RED | 2 | 5 | 27 | 199 |
| 71SS-H YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 28 | 186 |
| 72VC TEAL | 2 | 5 | 28 | 204 |
| 73HRCA-N GOLD | 2 | 5 | 28 | 208 |
| 74BCST RED | 2 | 5 | 29 | 209 |
| 75GR YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 29 | 217 |
| 76SKY RED | 2 | 5 | 30 | 204 |
| 77HFII RED | 2 | 5 | 31 | 211 |
| 78BM RED | 2 | 5 | 31 | 209 |
| 79WP-C ORANGE | 2 | 5 | 32 | 227 |
| 80BM PURPLE | 2 | 5 | 33 | 228 |
| 81CCV BLUE | 1 | 6 | 28 | 196 |
| 82KNO NAVY | 1 | 6 | 29 | 194 |
| 83FOX BLUE | 1 | 6 | 30 | 197 |
| 84CVTA PINK | 1 | 6 | 32 | 225 |
| 85VCC RED | 1 | 6 | 32 | 219 |
| 86CVTA PURPLE | 1 | 6 | 33 | 220 |
| 87SS-H TEAL | 1 | 6 | 34 | 223 |
| 88GR PINK | 1 | 6 | 34 | 228 |
| 89SS-LGT YELLOW | 1 | 6 | 35 | 221 |
| 90WP GREEN | 1 | 6 | 35 | 221 |
| 91WP YELLOW | 1 | 6 | 36 | 225 |
| 92EM RED | 1 | 6 | 38 | 235 |
| 93EM NAVY | 0 | 7 | 30 | 194 |
| 94GAC TEAL | 0 | 7 | 36 | 230 |
| 95HW RED | 0 | 7 | 38 | 232 |
| 96KC-CC RED | 0 | 7 | 38 | 235 |
| 97LTC-D TEAL | 0 | 7 | 38 | 229 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Zoe Williams + Ali Bolling | 5–0 | 69% games | +15.0% vs expected |
| Emily Olson + Molly Keeley | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Zoe Williams + Madeline Elway | 2–1 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Ali Bolling + Madeline Elway | 3–0 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.