Teams

CPCC YELLOW

2026 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-15vs PRKR GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Zelazek / Ilana Bove vs Amanda Snitker / Cynthia Boyce6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBritni Schlitt vs Megan Mckeown6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Bronersky / Brittany Grimm vs Jill Syvret / Stephanie Fingland6-1, 7-6
2026-07-08vs CPV BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Zelazek / Heather Hagen vs Mandy Short / Corby Williams6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesIlana Bove / Britni Schlitt vs Teri Aplin / Alice Boutilier6-4, 6-2
2026-07-01vs CCV BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Hagen / Sarah Zelazek vs Melissa Mitarotonda / Rebecca Aronoff6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesVanessa Hughes vs Lindsay Wingate6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCynthia Lantz / Dana Wield vs Beth Hines / Tina Suneja4-6, 2-6
2026-06-24vs RRTC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Hagen / Brittany Grimm vs Lisa Rowe / Manuela Seewald4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDana Wield / Katie Bronersky vs Katie Akers / Yohana Mendoza5-7, 5-7
2026-06-17vs HRCA-S TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Lantz / Britni Schlitt vs Angie Gallagher / Ann Barrett4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrittany Grimm vs Kylie Garrity6-1, 6-2
2026-06-10vs VCC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Zelazek / Vanessa Hughes vs Cammie Rausch / Kadie Desoe6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Lantz / Ilana Bove vs Carmen Mix / Ashley Dwyer7-6, 6-4
2026-06-03vs SS-LT NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Hagen / Sarah Zelazek vs Jennifer Matheson / Jennifer Price6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesIlana Bove vs Rebecca Powell6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVanessa Hughes / Britni Schlitt vs Suzette Calvillo / Joanne Holden6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings97 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC ORANGE701925117
2LEBTC PURPLE70201686
3CCC ORANGE701927105
4RRTC NAVY7017410121
5SS-D BLUE7017411139
6FOX RED7017412120
7EM BLUE7016512121
8HG RED7015615126
9GCC YELLOW7016516136
10CCC PINK6117410133
11CPCC YELLOW6116511127
12NJ ORANGE6116512114
13WP-G RED6115612131
14NJ PURPLE6116513155
15BTA-C YELLOW6115614136
16BRMST TEAL6115614151
17BRMST NAVY6115615140
18CACM RED6114718161
19HV PURPLE6113819167
20WP-O BLUE5215614139
21NJ TEAL5214715166
22PH GREEN5215616155
23DTP GREEN5214716138
24BCST BLUE5214717156
25CCV GREEN5214718147
26GNO YELLOW5212919169
27HW GREEN5212920168
28HV GREEN5212920151
29GR BLUE5212920172
30HRCA-N PINK5213820199
31RHCC BLUE5213821173
32RHCC RED52111024189
33KC-RH BLUE4314717170
34WC NAVY4313818163
35HV ORANGE4313818150
36CHCC NAVY4313820166
37WP-O NAVY4312920166
38SS-LT YELLOW4312921187
39CM BLUE43111021166
40BM GREEN4312922177
41DTC RED4313822162
42HRCA-S TEAL4312922164
43WC GREEN43101124175
44GCC ORANGE43101125175
45CM GREEN3412919147
46VC BLUE3412921171
47BP ORANGE34111022188
48SS-G GOLD34101122172
49BCC RED34101123171
50WP-G TEAL34101123160
51CCV RED34111024182
52MVCC GREEN34101124194
53LEBTC RED3491225183
54EM TEAL3491225196
55NJ GREEN3491226191
56SS-LT NAVY34101126201
57CPV BLUE3481328206
58PRKR GREEN3481328210
59COV PINK3481328198
60GAC RED3481329211
61RCC BLUE3471430212
62EM GREEN3471432218
63SS-LT GREEN2591224192
64HG GREEN2591225208
65CVTA TEAL2591225185
66GTC BLUE2591225201
67HW YELLOW2591226192
68MEA GREEN2591226198
69SKY BLUE2581327195
70PTC RED2581327199
71SS-H YELLOW2581328186
72VC TEAL2591228204
73HRCA-N GOLD25101128208
74BCST RED2571429209
75GR YELLOW2571429217
76SKY RED2571430204
77HFII RED2571431211
78BM RED2561531209
79WP-C ORANGE2571432227
80BM PURPLE2561533228
81CCV BLUE1671428196
82KNO NAVY1671429194
83FOX BLUE1661530197
84CVTA PINK1651632225
85VCC RED1661532219
86CVTA PURPLE1651633220
87SS-H TEAL1641734223
88GR PINK1641734228
89SS-LGT YELLOW1641735221
90WP GREEN1641735221
91WP YELLOW1651636225
92EM RED1621938235
93EM NAVY0761530194
94GAC TEAL0731836230
95HW RED0731838232
96KC-CC RED0721938235
97LTC-D TEAL0721938229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Sarah Zelazek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Heather Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Britni Schlitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.46
Vanessa Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Ilana Bove
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.40
Brittany Grimm
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.34
Katie Bronersky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Cynthia Lantz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.97
Dana Wield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Zelazek + Heather Hagen22267% games+9.3% vs expected
Cynthia Lantz + Britni Schlitt6060% games+8.9% vs expected
Heather Hagen + Brittany Grimm4258% games+2.4% vs expected
Brittany Grimm + Ilana Bove404 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Lantz + Ilana Bove134 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Grimm + Britni Schlitt213 matchesnot enough data
Britni Schlitt + Katie Bronersky303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Zelazek
32W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%14%86%
2.65
Heather Hagen
34W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.58
2.5
Britni Schlitt
15W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53
Vanessa Hughes
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Ilana Bove
18W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Brittany Grimm
30W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Katie Bronersky
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Cynthia Lantz
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Dana Wield
2W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.