Teams

CACM GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesJD Ready / Warren Adams vs Paul Mathews / Bradford Winslow6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDouglas Turner / Steven Graves vs Jose Amador / Eric Stromberg1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMacK Hone / Thomas Samuelson vs John Waring / Jeff Cline6-7, 6-7
2022-07-16vs LEBTC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJD Ready / Warren Adams vs David Hand / Tomo Watanabe2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Kyker / MacK Hone vs Kris Kaltenbacher / Andrew Folkerth6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-16vs LTA YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJD Ready / MacK Hone vs Ross Becker / Mark Hinman6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDouglas McPherson / Thomas Samuelson vs Jim Wilson / Scott Kornreich6-7, 4-6
2022-07-15vs CSU REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJD Ready / Warren Adams vs Christopher Fox / Joseph Knape6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Graves / Douglas McPherson vs Kevin Ellis / Tom Weller3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Huff / MacK Hone vs Doug Ruffin / Chris Bailey4-6, 2-6
2022-07-15vs CVTA NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesJD Ready / Douglas Turner vs Dean Harper / Xinlin Li1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Huff / MacK Hone vs Michael Winters / Theo Mandel4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
JD Ready
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
MacK Hone
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.97
Thomas Samuelson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Bob Lees
published 4
3.72
Adam Huff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Charles Kyker
published 4
Douglas McPherson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Graves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Warren Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Lees + Adam Huff3451% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
JD Ready
119W–116L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
MacK Hone
30W–34L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4
Thomas Samuelson
149W–92L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Bob Lees
21W–45L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Adam Huff
53W–85L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Charles Kyker
3W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Douglas McPherson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Steven Graves
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Warren Adams
21W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.