Teams

Na.Rodrigues18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-30vs Li.Fultz18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Stefanie Cage6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-23Won 10
W#3 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Catherine White6-1, 7-5
2024-07-16vs Le.Wright18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesDenise Decandia vs LUCY LAV6-3, 6-2
2024-07-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Mallory Altneu6-1, 6-1
2024-07-02vs Sh.Littleton18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Erin Wynia4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-30vs Le.Wright18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs LUCY LAV6-0, 6-0
2024-06-21vs Le.Barter18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Jenna Raynor3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDenise Decandia vs Charlotte Decker3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-19vs Ca.White18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesDenise Decandia vs Catherine White6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Lorah Henry6-2, 6-4
2024-05-28vs Sh.Littleton18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Kimberly McLellan4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Mallory Biringer
published 4
4.01
Lindsay Murdock
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4
3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
published
3.70
Liz Chen
published
3.55
Anna Kooper
published 3.5
3.53
Naomi Rodrigues
published
3.40
Denise Decandia
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Cari DeCandia
published 3.5
3.33
Karen Johnston
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Decandia + Cari DeCandia3550% games+1.3% vs expected
Karen Johnston + Lindsay Murdock5359% gamesnot enough data
Karen Johnston + Denise Decandia314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mallory Biringer
104W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Lindsay Murdock
149W–61L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
Liz Chen
22W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Anna Kooper
25W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.55
Naomi Rodrigues
35W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Denise Decandia
121W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Cari DeCandia
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Karen Johnston
259W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.