Teams

Le.Wright18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-30vs Le.Barter18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Jenna Raynor4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesNatalie Regan vs Leigh Barter1-6, 1-6
2024-07-23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLUCY LAV vs Heather Roberts4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-07-16vs Na.Rodrigues18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesLUCY LAV vs Denise Decandia3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Anna Kooper6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesNatalie Regan vs Cari DeCandia5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2024-07-09vs Sh.Littleton18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Shannon Littleton6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNatalie Regan vs Leah Curran7-6, 6-3
2024-07-02vs Ca.White18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLUCY LAV vs Lorah Henry1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNancy Gugliotta vs Catherine White4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-06-30vs Na.Rodrigues18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesLUCY LAV vs Lindsay Murdock0-6, 0-6
2024-06-25vs Le.Barter18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Leigh Barter5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesNatalie Regan vs Nicole Peterson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-06-18vs Li.Fultz18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Dianna Erwin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNatalie Regan vs Lorraine Hall6-3, 7-6
2024-06-05Split 11
L#1 SinglesNatalie Regan vs Rachel Matthews2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLUCY LAV vs April Taylor7-5, 6-1
2024-06-04vs Sh.Littleton18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMariana Lima Gonzalez vs Sydney Chick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNancy Gugliotta vs Julie Dougherty6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.40
Nancy Gugliotta
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Natalie Regan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
LUCY LAV
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Ashley Walton
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Gugliotta + Natalie Regan191054% games−1.5% vs expected
Nancy Gugliotta + LUCY LAV134 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Regan + LUCY LAV224 matchesnot enough data
LUCY LAV + Ashley Walton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
129W–73L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Nancy Gugliotta
166W–152L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Natalie Regan
160W–123L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
LUCY LAV
231W–188L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ashley Walton
18W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.