Teams

Choy

2026 Tri-Level Metro · 4.0

23 players · average NTRP 4.21 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule17 played
2026-06-01vs Metro: ZhogovLost 03
L#1 DoublesPrathirath Polepally / Wesley Maddox vs Ben Shapiro / David Hannon5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Trainer / Kilby Featherston vs Teppei Suzuki / Jesse Kallins0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric Laderman / Geoffrey Brennan vs Egor Zhogov / Ryan Lee0-6, 3-6
2026-05-17vs Verdoux/MurphyWon 21
W#1 DoublesWesley Maddox / Naveen Nath vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Sachs / GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN vs Seth Pamperin / Serge Verdoux7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSabian Kosinov / Rob Montgomery vs Julian Laird / Matt Murphy6-2, 6-7
2026-05-09vs Metro: ZhogovWon 21
W#1 DoublesWesley Maddox / Joseph Reiner vs Kwame Griffith / Ben Shapiro7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Trainer / GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN vs Jesse Kallins / Cosmo Amabile4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Flowers / Rob Montgomery vs Lenny Li / Egor Zhogov3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-23vs Verdoux/MurphySplit 11
W#1 DoublesNaveen Nath / Prathirath Polepally vs HUGO HASEGAWA / Tyler Miller7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSabian Kosinov / Chris Yoo vs Matthew Maycock / Julian Laird6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-16vs Metro: ZhogovWon 30
W#1 DoublesPrathirath Polepally / Sam Dern vs Eric Tomasini / David Hannon4-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesArthur Hainline / Matthew Sachs vs Patrick Knise / Jesse Kallins6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEric Laderman / Geoffrey Brennan vs Egor Zhogov / Lenny Li6-3, 7-6
2026-04-09vs Pink Pony ServesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlexander Jenner / Sabian Kosinov vs Joe Ottenthal / Fernando Zaragoza6-0, 6-1
2026-04-08vs Hard Court RivalryWon 10
W#1 DoublesZiJun Ou / Gaurav Chandra vs Alex Gonzalez / Miroslav Trunec6-3, 6-4
2026-04-01vs Eastern/Perez/4.0Tri-level MenWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlexander Jenner / Sabian Kosinov vs Day Yundan / Gabriel Birman6-2, 6-2
2026-03-31vs Verdoux/MurphySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Lindberg / Sam Dern vs Matthew Seiden / Christopher Durrang7-6, 5-4
L#3 DoublesArturo Benitez / Gaurav Chandra vs Yibang Liu / Julian Laird2-6, 4-6
2026-03-22vs Choy/MontgomeryWon 10
W#2 DoublesSabian Kosinov / Alexander Jenner vs David Wang / Thomas Jardine6-4, 6-4
2026-03-15vs SiasLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Ng / Sabian Kosinov vs William Packer / Graham Browne6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-15vs Pink Pony ServesWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrendan O'Connor / Gaurav Chandra vs Alexander Ojugbeli / Gregory Rich6-1, 6-1
2026-03-10vs SiasLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Lee / ZiJun Ou vs Jules Becker / Nam Nguyen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-02-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSabian Kosinov / Andrew Lim vs Richard Tang / Evan Spano4-6, 4-6
2026-02-11vs JhaveriWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Laderman / Horatio Wildman vs Vidur Mittal / Miguel Norena6-2, 6-4
2026-01-22vs Jordan/WongWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Laderman / Sangha Jung vs Felix Wang / David Mesina6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-07vs Love and LobWon 10
W#1 DoublesRob Montgomery / ZiJun Ou vs Christian Mcintosh Clarke / David Zhang6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Andy Dong
published 5
4.68
Joseph Reiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.68
Prathirath Polepally
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.66
Wesley Maddox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
John Lindberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Andrew Murano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Naveen Nath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Sam Dern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Arthur Hainline
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
ZiJun Ou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Eric Laderman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Matthew Sachs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Gaurav Chandra
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Michael Trainer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Chris Yoo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Rob Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.51
Geoffrey Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Sabian Kosinov
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.48
Arturo Benitez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Robert Flowers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Alvin Choy
published 3.5
Kilby Featherston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rob Montgomery + Geoffrey Brennan6164% games+37.6% vs expected
Arturo Benitez + Robert Flowers2349% games+13.8% vs expected
Arturo Benitez + Gaurav Chandra4256% games−7.2% vs expected
Arthur Hainline + Andrew Murano123 matchesnot enough data
Sam Dern + Matthew Sachs303 matchesnot enough data
Gaurav Chandra + Chris Yoo303 matchesnot enough data
Kilby Featherston + Michael Trainer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andy Dong
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
Joseph Reiner
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Prathirath Polepally
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Wesley Maddox
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.66
John Lindberg
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.35
4.5
Andrew Murano
5W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Naveen Nath
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%3%97%
4.26
GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN
47W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Sam Dern
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.02
4.5
Arthur Hainline
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.89
ZiJun Ou
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Eric Laderman
111W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Matthew Sachs
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.83
Gaurav Chandra
38W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Michael Trainer
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
4
Chris Yoo
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Rob Montgomery
27W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.54
Geoffrey Brennan
33W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
Sabian Kosinov
18W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Arturo Benitez
46W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Robert Flowers
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
3.5
Alvin Choy
60W–46L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Kilby Featherston
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.