Teams

BHerman (PCC)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 5.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-30vs JSwanson (Springfield)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrooks Herman / Cindy Stater vs Erica Turkus / Jen Abernathy0-6, 2-6
2024-09-23vs KDouglas (Firethorne CC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Stater / Barbara van Meerten vs Alisa Longo / Danielle Fricke1-6, 4-6
2024-09-09vs SJerrell/JKilduff (Sardis)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Stater / Karen Schaphorst vs Judy Kilduff / Lauren Stout2-6, 0-6
2024-08-26vs MSilla/SPapa (BCC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ross / Cindy Stater vs Siobhan Papa / Kim Rosenburgh7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaurie Eatman / Melissa Pavlovich vs Michelle Silla / Kristin Webster2-6, 3-6
2024-08-19vs TEby (OPRC)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKelly Algood / Laurie Eatman vs Caroleen Towery / Mary Skibinski2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Stater / Melissa Pavlovich vs Nannette Markham / Lisa Bottle6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-12vs LOBryan (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Eatman / Jess Heath vs Lisa OBryan / Lori Holman7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Laurie Eatman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.48
Jess Heath
published
2.41
Kelly Algood
published
2.38
Brooks Herman
published 2.5
2.33
Melissa Pavlovich
published
2.19
Barbara van Meerten
published 2.5
2.17
Cindy Stater
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Karen Schaphorst
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Eatman + Cindy Stater3347% games+8.7% vs expected
Laurie Eatman + Brooks Herman2548% games+7.3% vs expected
Kelly Algood + Cindy Stater044 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Eatman + Barbara van Meerten134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Algood + Melissa Pavlovich123 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Eatman + Karen Schaphorst033 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Eatman + Melissa Pavlovich123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Laurie Eatman
19W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%47%53%
2.51
Jess Heath
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%55%45%
2.48
Kelly Algood
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.41
2.5
Brooks Herman
14W–24L career · no lines in 2024
0%82%18%
2.38
Melissa Pavlovich
5W–25L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Barbara van Meerten
2W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Cindy Stater
22W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Karen Schaphorst
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.