Teams

LTFC NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 4.45 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-18vs LEBTC BLUELost 12
W#1 SinglesJames Jaggers vs Hernan Mendez6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEric Wohl / Vance Wagenknecht vs Troy Warrick / Tony Gerome0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDallas Bogner / David Benson vs Tim Taylor / Randy Skalla4-6, 3-6
2024-07-11vs SS-H BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesChris Blackman / Nathan Couch vs Benjamin Walker / Paul Whipple3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJames Jaggers vs Jose Amador6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesScott Sagel / Scott Landen vs Hector Trevino / Jordan Jacob2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Nelson / Steve Zubowicz vs Ben Atlee / Bradford Winslow5-7, 6-7
2024-06-29vs GAC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesGregory Nelson / David Benson vs Alex Le / Michael Alexander1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJames Jaggers vs Daniel Pace6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAndrew Treloar / Steve Zubowicz vs David Barry / Matthew Hooper3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNathan Couch / Scott Landen vs Dan Murphy / Daniel Green1-6, 0-6
2024-06-27vs CR-B BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesScott Sagel / Andrew Treloar vs Michael Matthews / Jeffrey Todd5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJames Jaggers vs Tomo Watanabe6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrett Shrewsbury / Steve Zubowicz vs Michael Olds / William Epping4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Benson / Vance Wagenknecht vs Gustavo Belloso / Robert Gabriel7-6, 6-2
2024-06-13vs ATC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesAndrew Treloar / Eric Wohl vs Robert Brown / Zachary Bishop6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrett Shrewsbury vs David Eckelberger2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Couch / Chris Blackman vs William Morris / Daniel Washburne3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDallas Bogner / Vance Wagenknecht vs Charles Roosevelt / Huntington Walker7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-06vs EM BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesAndrew Treloar / Steve Zubowicz vs Benjamin Kuruvila / Randy Mancherian1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesScott Sagel vs Will Essin3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEric Wohl / Chris Blackman vs Fadi Zakhem / Kent Redding6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Benson / Gregory Nelson vs Mark Lindstrom / Bill Speck3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Steve Zubowicz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
James Jaggers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Andrew Treloar
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Christopher Hillary
published 4.5
4.10
Scott Sagel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Blair MacNeill
published 4.5
4.07
Chris Blackman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Gregory Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.90
Brett Shrewsbury
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.85
Eric Wohl
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Vance Wagenknecht
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dallas Bogner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Nathan Couch
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Landen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Wohl + Scott Sagel3547% games+1.1% vs expected
Eric Wohl + Andrew Treloar4654% games−2.4% vs expected
Gregory Nelson + Scott Sagel0539% games−5.7% vs expected
Scott Sagel + Brett Shrewsbury4347% gamesnot enough data
Eric Wohl + Brett Shrewsbury2344% gamesnot enough data
Gregory Nelson + Eric Wohl033 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Nelson + Vance Wagenknecht033 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Nelson + Nathan Couch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Steve Zubowicz
105W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
James Jaggers
74W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Andrew Treloar
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Hillary
27W–20L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.11
Scott Sagel
26W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Blair MacNeill
38W–14L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Chris Blackman
39W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Gregory Nelson
14W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.98
4.5
Brett Shrewsbury
18W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.90
4.5
Eric Wohl
30W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.85
Vance Wagenknecht
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Dallas Bogner
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nathan Couch
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Landen
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.