Teams

Schwartz (Coral Oaks)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.0 Adult Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Stephanie Voell
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.83
Michele Saverin
published
Carolina Concha
published 3
2.72
Allison Reilly
published 3
2.65
Lisa Murray
published
2.63
Jackie Kearns
published
2.59
Lina Tower
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.57
Fran Roberts
published
2.54
Astrid Arditi
published 3
2.50
Zoe Leinoff
published
2.49
Marylynne Schwartz
published
2.46
Rolande Rose
published
2.40
Nadia Pazos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marylynne Schwartz + Allison Reilly2639% games+1.2% vs expected
Lisa Murray + Stephanie Voell4247% games−3.0% vs expected
Nadia Pazos + Astrid Arditi1837% games−3.3% vs expected
Zoe Leinoff + Rolande Rose0733% games−11.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Stephanie Voell
63W–59L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Michele Saverin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Carolina Concha
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Allison Reilly
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Lisa Murray
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
Jackie Kearns
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
2.5
Lina Tower
16W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
Fran Roberts
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Astrid Arditi
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Zoe Leinoff
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Marylynne Schwartz
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Rolande Rose
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Nadia Pazos
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.