Teams

1MONY-KELLY win tri 45 40 35 W SEM F2

2025 aSEM TRI-LEVEL - WINTER · 2025 Tri-Level Jan Med 4.5 4.0 3.5 Women SEM

16 players · average NTRP 3.80 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule17 played
L#1 DoublesMargaret Cahill / Kylee Bezeau vs Hilary Hayden / Lyndsey Lucas2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Morgan / Elizabeth King vs Christie Dickinson / Frances Carlson6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Roman / Kristin Kelly vs Ruth Le / Emily Dawson4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJennifer Morgan / Elizabeth Himebauch vs Stephanie Schulte / Jessica Kruczek2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Kelly / Katelyn McDowell vs Marcia Varner / Kate Gavagan0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth King / Kelsey O'Connor vs Kelsey Jeletz / Claire Mulier0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Schmidt / JENNIFER O'FARRILL DIAZ vs Beth Fahr / Susan Joseph3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCarrie Schmidt / Katherine Arst vs Qi Gao / Chelsea Doyle1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Himebauch / Jennifer Morgan vs Sarah Benoit / Hannah Pianko1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth King / Katelyn McDowell vs Sarah Fahrbach / Susi Shaw3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Brilliant / Carolyn Roman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Schmidt / Emily Dawson vs Huiping Chen / Kenda Abou Okdeh7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Himebauch / Kylee Bezeau vs Hilary Hayden / Lyndsey Lucas1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Morgan / Katelyn McDowell vs Megan Etheridge / Kerri-Ann Croftchik4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Kelly / Carolyn Roman vs Christine Kim / Chelsea Doyle3-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesElizabeth King / Leslie Ehrman vs Tammy Watson / Emily Bambini7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesNancy Rumpf / Margaret Cahill vs McCall Monte / Emily Radner7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Morgan / Eira Duran vs Claire Baenen / Amy Gonte1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Schmidt / Elizabeth King vs Jocelyn Smith / Michelle Lanesky4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie Schmidt / Jeanne Cooper vs Tracy Jackson / Michelle Chinnaiyan7-5, 6-0
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Himebauch / Nancy Rumpf vs Sarah Benoit / Kristin Stein5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEira Duran / Kylee Bezeau vs Sarah Fahrbach / Diane Fingar6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Roman / Kristin Kelly vs Cynthia Gur-Arie / Susi Shaw3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMaria Johnston / Elizabeth King vs Chelsea Doyle / Karen Hale3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMargaret Cahill / Elizabeth Himebauch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEira Duran / Jennifer Morgan vs Christina Slade / Madeline Slade2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth King / Kristin Kelly vs Chelsea Doyle / Ruth Le5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Schmidt / Jeanne Cooper vs Colleen Hughes / Lisa Hutton6-0, 6-1
L#1 DoublesEira Duran / Elizabeth Himebauch vs Stephanie Schulte / Emily Radner1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatelyn McDowell / Erin Wallen vs Claire Baenen / Jillian Brooks3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Kelly / Denise Rieckhoff vs Kelsey Jeletz / Alicia LaBeau0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesCarrie Schmidt / Tammy Watson vs Julia Ditmore / Lisa Hutton4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesNancy Rumpf / Kylee Bezeau vs Kristin Stein / Sarah Benoit6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKristin Kelly / Carrie Schmidt vs Cynthia Gur-Arie / Elizabeth Caswell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 2025 Tri-Level Jan Med 4.5 4.0 3.5 Women SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12EAST-MONTE win tri 45 40 35 W SEM F28121617184
22FAC-STEINER win tri 45 40 35 W SEM16216821196
34LIB-SAULD win tri 45 40 35 W SEM F26320715207
43DEER-MENGYAN win tri 45 40 35 W SEM144111334246
53CHIP-SHAW win tri 45 40 35 W SEM F23672043289
61TROY-STRACHAN win tri 45 40 35 W SEM12691535240
71MONY-KELLY win tri 45 40 35 W SEM F21862142274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Nancy Rumpf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Margaret Cahill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Kylee Bezeau
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Carrie Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Gracie Almester
published
3.46
Eira Duran
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Elizabeth King
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.44
Katelyn McDowell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Kristin Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.17
Kelsey O'Connor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Erin Wallen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Julie Brilliant
published
2.74
Carolyn Roman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Denise Rieckhoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Himebauch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Morgan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eira Duran + Carrie Schmidt10259% games+5.9% vs expected
Eira Duran + Jennifer Morgan7359% games+5.8% vs expected
Katelyn McDowell + Kristin Kelly5451% games+4.8% vs expected
Carrie Schmidt + Elizabeth King13457% games+2.3% vs expected
Denise Rieckhoff + Carolyn Roman2441% games+2.2% vs expected
Kelsey O'Connor + Carolyn Roman6644% games+1.0% vs expected
Carolyn Roman + Kristin Kelly71145% games+0.1% vs expected
Carolyn Roman + Carrie Schmidt6066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nancy Rumpf
93W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Margaret Cahill
99W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
4.22
Kylee Bezeau
49W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Carrie Schmidt
108W–65L career · 8 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Gracie Almester
28W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Eira Duran
144W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Elizabeth King
204W–149L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
Katelyn McDowell
27W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Kristin Kelly
41W–50L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Kelsey O'Connor
28W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Erin Wallen
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Julie Brilliant
13W–39L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Carolyn Roman
110W–137L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Denise Rieckhoff
28W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Elizabeth Himebauch
3W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Morgan
102W–67L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.