Teams

4LIB-HAESSLER win tri DAY 40 35 30 W SEM

2025 aSEM TRI-LEVEL - WINTER · 2025 Tri-Level DAYS Jan Low 4.0 3.5 3.0 Women SEM

22 players · average NTRP 3.62 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesChristie Dickinson / Elizabeth Mosher vs Dawn Clegg / Lisa Lopatin6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJessica Haessler / Qi Gao vs Michelle Chinnaiyan / Ana Rotar3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKorin Kustarz / Tracy Esposito vs Stephanie Finland / Lina E Bata2-6, 0-3
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Mosher / Ashley Mooney vs Michelle Watson / Leslie Schneemann1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Hale / Dee Lamphear vs Susan Joseph / Beth Fahr6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMaya Clem / Xuerong Mu vs Laine Johnson / Carmen Mollicone6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVivian Marley / Karen Hale vs Otome Kitamura / Huiping Chen3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesXuerong Mu / Tracy Esposito vs Rebecca Sammut / Ashley Bahri6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesAbigail Bremer / Christie Dickinson vs Myrna Harbar / Lisa Lopatin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Arst / Karen Hale vs Tracy Jackson / Michelle Chinnaiyan6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracy Esposito / Libby Hemphill vs Jenna Klar / Claudia Langsdorf4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Hale / Dee Lamphear vs Jeanne Cooper / JENNIFER O'FARRILL DIAZ6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLibby Hemphill / Tracy Esposito vs Maren Dobson / Noelle Todd4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Haessler / Colleen Hughes vs Jessica Brandt / Rebecca Barry2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKorin Kustarz / Tracy Esposito vs Lindsey Weitzman. / Erin Koppelman1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Mooney / Katherine Arst vs Shannon Morgan / Michelle Sutkiewicz6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLibby Hemphill / Teressa Funkhouser vs Carmen Mollicone / Monica Padilla6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesAbigail Bremer / Frances Carlson vs Kana Chan / Aiko Lapinski3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesQi Gao / Dee Lamphear vs Kenda Abou Okdeh / Huiping Chen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKorin Kustarz / Maya Clem vs Otome Kitamura / Chiharu Kanaoka3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Hughes / Lisa Hutton vs Carrie Schmidt / Jeanne Cooper0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTeressa Funkhouser / Xuerong Mu vs Maren Dobson / Elizabeth Skochelak2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesQi Gao / Katherine Arst vs Hanna Song / Jennifer Kunec3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKorin Kustarz / Xuerong Mu vs Melanee Radner / Betsy Hollander4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 2025 Tri-Level DAYS Jan Low 4.0 3.5 3.0 Women SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11HV-WATSON win tri DAY 40 35 30 W SEM9122824248
26FAC-LAU win tri DAY 40 35 30 W SEM64171329254
32WESS-LI win tri DAY 40 35 30 W SEM55161430253
45SCWB-CHAN win tri DAY 40 35 30 W SEM55171331269
54LIB-HAESSLER win tri DAY 40 35 30 W SEM46121838296
63DEER-SUTKIEWICZ win tri DAY 40 35 30 W SEM1962451337

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Christina Slade
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Frances Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Christie Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Laura LeVasseur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Abigail Bremer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Ashley Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Karen Hale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Megan Etheridge
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Dee Lamphear
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.51
Elizabeth Mosher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Katherine Arst
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.32
Colleen Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Qi Gao
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Lisa Hutton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Teressa Funkhouser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.99
Libby Hemphill
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.93
Vivian Marley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Tracy Esposito
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.86
Xuerong Mu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Jessica Haessler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Korin Kustarz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Maya Clem
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Xuerong Mu + Libby Hemphill3260% games+15.6% vs expected
Frances Carlson + Ashley Mooney5065% games+10.8% vs expected
Karen Hale + Dee Lamphear13261% games+8.1% vs expected
Megan Etheridge + Dee Lamphear30959% games+7.7% vs expected
Megan Etheridge + Ashley Mooney4163% games+5.6% vs expected
Christina Slade + Megan Etheridge4257% games+5.4% vs expected
Laura LeVasseur + Christina Slade16662% games+4.2% vs expected
Xuerong Mu + Korin Kustarz3253% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Slade
245W–103L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Frances Carlson
144W–64L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Christie Dickinson
111W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Laura LeVasseur
122W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Abigail Bremer
81W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Ashley Mooney
128W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Karen Hale
171W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Megan Etheridge
147W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Dee Lamphear
156W–65L career · 7 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Elizabeth Mosher
169W–93L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Katherine Arst
118W–43L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Colleen Hughes
37W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Qi Gao
95W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Lisa Hutton
124W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Teressa Funkhouser
52W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.02
3
Libby Hemphill
120W–78L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3.5
Vivian Marley
107W–94L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Tracy Esposito
44W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Xuerong Mu
102W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Jessica Haessler
117W–128L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Korin Kustarz
65W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Maya Clem
14W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.