Teams

LKHA-Hallman/CSD

2025 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-14vs LKGO-Goodnough/WestportWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanna Huggins / Maria Emilia de la Orden vs Cheryl Woodruff / Melinda Urban6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Hallman / Michelle Fontana vs Nathalie Naslund / Diane Davis6-4, 6-3
2025-05-07vs LJRI-Ritter/JETTONWon 40
W#1 DoublesSusan Davis / Janna Huggins vs Jana Ritter / Tabitha Elledge6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAngela Stallman vs Kaylin Scher4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Hallman / Michelle Fontana vs Shana Erber / Lisa Zeitz6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCortney Griffin / Michelle Skaggs vs Kristy Del Monte / Serena Igharas6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-30vs LNKA-Kayton-Robinson CSDWon 20
W#2 SinglesAngela Stallman vs Tamilla Azamova6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCortney Griffin / Stefanie Flippin vs Lee Ann Ahern / Nicole Kayton6-1, 6-0
2025-04-23vs LABO-Bonham/NMP 18+ 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Davis / Kelly Hallman vs Katherine Dugan / Leta Wiley6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAngela Stallman vs Ellyn Pavelka6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanna Huggins / Sydney Williams vs Morgan Hoecherl / Buket Boucher6-1, 7-6
2025-04-13vs LKGO-Goodnough/WestportWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanna Huggins / Jamie Krueger vs Cheryl Woodruff / Melinda Urban6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAngela Stallman vs Nathalie Naslund6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Hallman / Maggie Siebert vs Rebecca Karner / Bridgett Dedmond6-3, 6-2
2025-03-26vs LJRI-Ritter/JETTONSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKelly Hallman / Jamie Krueger vs Beth Packard / Megan Hartley6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCortney Griffin / Sydney Williams vs Serena Igharas / Kristy Del Monte5-7, 3-6
2025-03-19vs LNKA-Kayton-Robinson CSDWon 10
W#2 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Kelly Hallman vs Miriam Murray / Heather Bain6-1, 6-2
2025-03-12vs LABO-Bonham/NMP 18+ 4.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesJanna Huggins / Maria Emilia de la Orden vs Kelly Lesso / Buket Boucher6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Skaggs / Maggie Siebert vs Leta Wiley / Katherine Dugan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAngela Stallman vs Morgan Hoecherl6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Davis / Cortney Griffin vs Amy Marin / Kathleen Navola7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
4.06
Jamie Krueger
published
3.93
Kelly Hallman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.81
Maggie Siebert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Lauren Hession
published
3.79
Allison Stearns
published 4
3.77
Janna Huggins
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.76
Angela Stallman
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 4
3.75
Stefanie Flippin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Michelle Fontana
published
3.52
Michelle Skaggs
published
3.34
Cortney Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Fontana + Kelly Hallman5068% games+10.6% vs expected
Kelly Hallman + Maggie Siebert9357% games+6.4% vs expected
Stefanie Flippin + Kelly Hallman181056% games+1.3% vs expected
Cortney Griffin + Kelly Hallman6455% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie Flippin + Cortney Griffin6160% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie Flippin + Maggie Siebert7064% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Hallman + Janna Huggins4251% gamesnot enough data
Angela Stallman + Janna Huggins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Emilia de la Orden
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Jamie Krueger
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Kelly Hallman
126W–65L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Maggie Siebert
94W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Lauren Hession
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Allison Stearns
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Janna Huggins
63W–61L career · 11 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Angela Stallman
93W–48L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Stefanie Flippin
164W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Michelle Fontana
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Michelle Skaggs
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Cortney Griffin
156W–91L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.