Teams

Wise Ace GOATs

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.14 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-06vs O'Briens PubLost 01
L#2 DoublesKrishna Polisetty / Helmut Klemperer vs Chip Hathaway / Sudheerkumar Radhakrishnan0-6, 2-6
2021-06-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesTed Breinig / Walter Gomez-Rometti vs Jesse Anderson / Christopher Mai6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-20vs Post-Modern ForehandSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTom Ladenburg / Ted Breinig vs Ati Ok / James Nolan6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKyle Gustafson / Yong Kim vs Aaron Ohmer / Doan Nguyen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-12vs Hot ShotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKrishna Polisetty / Michael Tipton vs Alan Ogilvie / Bob White1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKyle Gustafson vs Jared Sharp7-6, 2-2
2021-05-08vs Z's Last Chance SaloonLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Collins / Krishna Polisetty vs Mike Burgoyne / Barry Dickman4-6, 2-6
2021-05-06vs Bengal Tigers 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKyle Gustafson / Roberto Ramos vs Sai Maddi / Muthukrishnan Ganesan3-6, 4-2
2021-04-28vs Tennis TitansLost 01
L#2 DoublesTed Breinig / Michael Tipton vs Ethan Bui / Doan Nguyen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cameron Ross
published 4.5
4.19
Tom Ladenburg
published 4.5
4.08
3.80
Krishna Polisetty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Thoufiq Kaleemullah
published
Helmut Klemperer
published 4
3.72
Kyle Gustafson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.51
Nathan Chow
published
3.44
Ted Breinig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Yong Kim
published
Stephen Gotts
published
Sumeet Chawla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jagannath Chakravarty + Tom Ladenburg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cameron Ross
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Tom Ladenburg
92W–64L career · type A · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Jagannath Chakravarty
12W–8L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
4.08
4
Krishna Polisetty
79W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Thoufiq Kaleemullah
11W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Helmut Klemperer
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kyle Gustafson
52W–79L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
Nathan Chow
13W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Ted Breinig
33W–56L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
Yong Kim
5W–19L career · no lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
3.26
Stephen Gotts
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sumeet Chawla
23W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.