Teams

O'Briens Pub

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.30 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-06vs Wise Ace GOATsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJustin Dorsk vs Cameron Ross6-7, 1-1
W#3 DoublesAmit Gupta / Milin Iyer vs Sumeet Chawla / Yong Kim6-4, 4-5
2021-05-24vs Tennis TitansLost 01
L#3 DoublesJustin Dorsk / Milin Iyer vs Matthew Wehle / Doan Nguyen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-26vs Team RJT M4.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesJustin Dorsk vs Keith Bown6-1, 6-1
2021-04-24vs Bengal Tigers 4.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesJustin Dorsk vs Sahil Chaudhary6-1, 5-4
W#3 DoublesMilin Iyer / Michael Morris vs Senthil Kumar Seetharaman / Chandra Shekhar Ramshetti4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Yue She
published
4.11
Chip Hathaway
published 4.5
4.07
3.95
Justin Dorsk
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.86
Jordan Bentley
published
Aaron Thede
published 4
3.59
Milin Iyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jorge Prieto Choy
published
Maximillian Chang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Dorsk + Milin Iyer033 matchesnot enough data
Justin Dorsk + Chip Hathaway213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yue She
7W–17L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Chip Hathaway
207W–115L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Gaiell-Mitchell Kercy
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Justin Dorsk
126W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.95
Jordan Bentley
23W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Aaron Thede
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Milin Iyer
99W–128L career · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
Jorge Prieto Choy
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maximillian Chang
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sudheerkumar Radhakrishnan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.