Teams

LTA YELLOW

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-23vs LAC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Romero / Stephanie Ohlsen vs Paula King / Diane Popp6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJackye Whalen / Pat Burgener vs Susan Haley / Susan Rasmussen4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlicia Hillen / Hanlie Wessels vs Sally O'Dell / Deborah Stoner3-6, 6-7
2021-06-16vs ARCA ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Ellen O'Rell / Catherine Romero vs Sunnie Glaister / Lori Segeth6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Ohlsen / Patricia Meyer vs Kathy Schmidt / Pamela Lawing6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJackye Whalen / Alicia Hillen vs Mary Dowling / Barbara Fair7-6, 4-4
2021-06-09vs LTA BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Sargent / Catherine Romero vs Dena Stark / Kathy Doyle2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Ohlsen / Alicia Hillen vs Tricia Marsh / Laura Zempel6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Ellen O'Rell / Hanlie Wessels vs Marcia Hayes / Patty Orban6-4, 6-3
2021-06-02vs BTA REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMia Morrison / Patricia Meyer vs Susan Olenwine / Abby Scott4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Ohlsen / Catherine Romero vs Samantha McBride / Debby Bell6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMary Ellen O'Rell / Jackye Whalen vs Kathy Webber / Lyne Cahn0-6, 0-6
2021-05-26vs RCC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Ohlsen / Patricia Meyer vs Rondi Herman / Jill Nelson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMia Morrison / Kathleen Sargent vs Cindy Ronlov / Pamela Subry2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHanlie Wessels / Pat Burgener vs Kristine Foulk / Christy Pocs6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-19vs BRMST NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesMia Morrison / Alicia Hillen vs Carol Anderson / Cynthia Manley3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Meyer / Jackye Whalen vs Kathy Depinto / Kimberley Paulsen1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Ellen O'Rell / Pat Burgener vs Cynthia Burchell / Jill Bouck1-6, 3-6
2021-05-13vs ARCA ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Romero / Kathleen Sargent vs Kathy Schmidt / Joan Robinson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatricia Meyer / Pat Burgener vs Karlyn Kamm / Sunnie Glaister1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlicia Hillen / Stephanie Ohlsen vs Mary Dowling / Barbara Fair2-6, 4-6
2021-05-12vs CVTA REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Romero / Kathleen Sargent vs Linda Schutter / Teri Jean Fry2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlicia Hillen / Stephanie Ohlsen vs Susan Hoy / Beth Marvel2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPat Burgener / Mary Ellen O'Rell vs Maryl Bergeson / Terry Tessier3-6, 2-6
2021-05-05vs LAC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Romero / Kathleen Sargent vs Susan Rasmussen / Sally O'Dell6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMia Morrison / Alicia Hillen vs Odile Lynch / Paula King1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPat Burgener / Hanlie Wessels vs Amy Paterra / Deborah Stoner7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Catherine Romero
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.36
Stephanie Ohlsen
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.03
Pat Burgener
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.02
Jackye Whalen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Alicia Hillen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.77
Kathleen Sargent
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Mia Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.37
Mary Ellen O'Rell
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Hanlie Wessels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
TOMOKO WATANABE
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mia Morrison + Mary Ellen O'Rell4451% games+1.3% vs expected
Catherine Romero + Kathleen Sargent6457% games+0.8% vs expected
Alicia Hillen + Mia Morrison31042% games−4.3% vs expected
Kathleen Sargent + Mary Ellen O'Rell0824% games−8.7% vs expected
Jackye Whalen + Mia Morrison134 matchesnot enough data
Jackye Whalen + Mary Ellen O'Rell044 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Sargent + Mia Morrison044 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Hillen + Stephanie Ohlsen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Romero
86W–80L career · 7 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Stephanie Ohlsen
134W–63L career · 13 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Pat Burgener
67W–78L career · 11 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Jackye Whalen
50W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Alicia Hillen
39W–72L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Kathleen Sargent
29W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Mia Morrison
34W–77L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Mary Ellen O'Rell
20W–73L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.37
Hanlie Wessels
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
TOMOKO WATANABE
20W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.