Teams

RCC GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-23vs ARCA ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Nelson / Rondi Herman vs Sunnie Glaister / Karlyn Kamm4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Bailey / Pamela Subry vs Mary Dowling / Joan Robinson6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Borg / Christy Pocs vs Kathy Schmidt / Pamela Lawing6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-16vs LTA BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Rondi Herman vs Debra Heiser / Maureen Hartigan2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeanne Vonachen / Nancy Borg vs Laura Zempel / Tricia Marsh6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Sands / Kristine Foulk vs Patty Orban / Linda Hattel6-3, 6-4
2021-06-09vs BTA REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesRondi Herman / Jill Nelson vs Polly Rothberg / Samantha McBride4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Ronlov / Pamela Subry vs Peggy Phillips / Kathy Webber6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristy Pocs / Kristine Foulk vs Dawn Jensen / Joan Nagel7-5, 6-3
2021-06-02vs BRMST NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Jill Bouck / Kathy Depinto2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRondi Herman / Jill Nelson vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Carol Anderson5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Subry / Nancy Borg vs Kimberley Paulsen / Vickie Garn3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-26vs LTA YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesRondi Herman / Jill Nelson vs Stephanie Ohlsen / Patricia Meyer6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCindy Ronlov / Pamela Subry vs Mia Morrison / Kathleen Sargent6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKristine Foulk / Christy Pocs vs Hanlie Wessels / Pat Burgener7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2021-05-19vs CVTA REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Ronlov / Christy Pocs vs Teri Jean Fry / Susan Hoy3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Borg / Pamela Subry vs Maryl Bergeson / Mary Buchanan3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKristine Foulk / Barbara Sands vs Beth Marvel / Christine Lewis5-7, 3-6
2021-05-12vs LAC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanne Vonachen / Janice Bailey vs Paula King / Odile Lynch2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJill Nelson / Christy Pocs vs Susan Rasmussen / Susan Haley3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLisa Highley / Barbara Sands vs Laurie Chrisman / Deborah Stoner6-1, 6-3
2021-05-07vs LTA BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Highley / Rondi Herman vs Dena Stark / Kathy Doyle1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Maureen Hartigan / Linda Hattel6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeanne Vonachen / Kristine Foulk vs Patty Orban / Laura Zempel6-4, 6-2
2021-05-05vs ARCA ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Karlyn Kamm / Sunnie Glaister6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRondi Herman / Jill Nelson vs Donna Louie / Joan Robinson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Borg / Lisa Highley vs Mary Dowling / Barbara Fair6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Janice Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Lisa Highley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Cindy Ronlov
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Subry
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Barbara Sands
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Christy Pocs
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jeanne Vonachen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kristine Foulk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Borg
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Rondi Herman
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Vonachen + Janice Bailey7365% games+10.2% vs expected
Cindy Ronlov + Janice Bailey552858% games−0.3% vs expected
Lisa Highley + Janice Bailey4254% games−0.7% vs expected
Rondi Herman + Lisa Highley0540% games−14.1% vs expected
Kristine Foulk + Lisa Highley1441% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Highley + Barbara Sands4160% gamesnot enough data
Jeanne Vonachen + Lisa Highley134 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Vonachen + Kristine Foulk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janice Bailey
95W–55L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Lisa Highley
71W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cindy Ronlov
112W–72L career · 6 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Pamela Subry
14W–25L career · 5 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.06
Barbara Sands
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Christy Pocs
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeanne Vonachen
19W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristine Foulk
8W–17L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Borg
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rondi Herman
8W–16L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.