Teams

GAC RED

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-07vs HW REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Cremer / Trevor Rudolph vs Jason Ogden / Michael Washer1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGregory Kaczmarczyk / Patrick Reed vs Kelly Bolin / Brent Lenderman1-6, 3-6
2021-08-24vs ATC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Trevor Rudolph vs Peter Ludwig / Mark Davis2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesChris Cremer vs Zachary Davis4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesGregory Kaczmarczyk / Dimitri Kaufman vs Eric Owen / James Sigman3-6, 3-6
2021-08-17vs KC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Cremer / Dimitri Kaufman vs Ryan Logsdon / Mark Beelaert6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTrevor Rudolph vs Brian Gallant3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Nole / Christopher Williams vs Roger Bowers / Dennis Gilmore4-6, 2-6
2021-08-10vs GCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesDimitri Kaufman / Chris Cremer vs Mark Dennis / Brad Manley6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGregory Kaczmarczyk / Christopher Williams vs Dan Grooters / Michael Nimmo5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-08-03vs KC GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Cremer / Michael Nole vs Gary Smith / Gary Hosler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTrevor Rudolph vs Michael Lemar6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPatrick Reed / Dimitri Kaufman vs Damon Judd / Craig Penn6-4, 6-3
2021-07-27vs SSLT ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Cremer / Michael Nole vs Rob Mullins / Adam Kerr2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTrevor Rudolph vs Charles Phanumphai0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDimitri Kaufman / Christopher Williams vs Jonathan Hoke / Joe Dawson1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Chris Cremer
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
Gabriel Damico
published 4
3.59
Patrick Reed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dimitri Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Gregory Kaczmarczyk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Michael Nole
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Trevor Rudolph
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Reed + Dimitri Kaufman3445% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Cremer
110W–54L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
4.32
4
Gabriel Damico
19W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Patrick Reed
58W–138L career · 2 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Dimitri Kaufman
20W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Gregory Kaczmarczyk
22W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Michael Nole
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Trevor Rudolph
8W–16L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.