Teams

LKPO-Powell/Westport 40s

2022 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-11vs LGEarnshaw/SkybrookWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeagan Palmer / Astrid Peterson vs Samantha Schneider / Amy Barnett6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMali Robinson / Sandra Self vs Susan Bolger / Michelle McLauchlan6-2, 6-1
2022-05-04vs LSTheisen/JettonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Kathleen Stiffler vs Sheila Chast / Sheryl Theisen6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMeagan Palmer / Astrid Peterson vs Kelly Gimlin / Melinda Little6-2, 6-4
2022-04-20vs LKGrathwohl/RR 3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Shirley Pirkl vs Lauren Verlander / Jennifer Blevins6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Susan Pomroy vs Brooke Harris / Bridgette Ashbrook5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMali Robinson / Meagan Palmer vs Cara Stanford / Melora Driver6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-13vs LCRupp/CaldwellLost 03
L#1 DoublesBridgett Dedmond / Kathleen Stiffler vs Mindy Sells / Cori Peters3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Childers / Mali Robinson vs Lauren Herrmann / Katherine Karnatz3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Sandra Self vs Lisa Bograd / Aimee Reimann2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-06vs LLTU-Turley/JettonLost 02
L#1 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Sherilyn Dlugolenski vs Candace Newman / Terri Langbo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMeagan Palmer / Mali Robinson vs Stacy Beardslee / Donna Werner6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-30Won 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Shirley Pirkl vs Michelle McLauchlan / Debbie Siegel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSherilyn Dlugolenski / Meagan Palmer vs Susan Bolger / Robbie Isaac6-0, 6-1
2022-03-27vs LSTheisen/JettonWon 21
W#1 SinglesKathleen Stiffler vs Jennifer Saxton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Mali Robinson vs Julie Moore / Sheryl Theisen5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Meagan Palmer vs Subashini Thomas / Suzy Wright6-0, 6-1
2022-03-16vs LKGrathwohl/RR 3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Bridgett Dedmond vs Erin MacAulay / Cara Stanford6-1, 6-4
2022-03-09vs LCRupp/CaldwellLost 12
L#1 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Mali Robinson vs Lauren Herrmann / Katherine Karnatz5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKathleen Stiffler vs ERIN CLARK7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSherilyn Dlugolenski / Catherine Wulfhorst vs Corrine Rupp / Lisa Bograd4-6, 1-6
2022-03-02vs LLTU-Turley/JettonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMeagan Palmer / Kathleen Stiffler vs Donna Werner / Terri Langbo0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Shirley Pirkl vs Beth Welch / Danielle Diehl6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Danielle Curwood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Bridgett Dedmond
published 3.5
3.35
Brenda Clay
published 3.5
3.23
Mali Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Astrid Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.07
Angela Childers
published 3.5
3.00
Kathleen Stiffler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.88
Sandra Self
published
2.82
Sherilyn Dlugolenski
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Shirley Pirkl
published
2.25
Catherine Wulfhorst
published 2.5
2.15
Kerri Powell
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Clay + Danielle Curwood14464% games+5.0% vs expected
Astrid Peterson + Mali Robinson203445% games−0.4% vs expected
Danielle Curwood + Sherilyn Dlugolenski5356% gamesnot enough data
Astrid Peterson + Bridgett Dedmond2347% gamesnot enough data
Astrid Peterson + Sherilyn Dlugolenski314 matchesnot enough data
Bridgett Dedmond + Mali Robinson314 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Curwood + Kathleen Stiffler224 matchesnot enough data
Astrid Peterson + Kathleen Stiffler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Curwood
205W–137L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.71
3.5
Bridgett Dedmond
91W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Brenda Clay
40W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Mali Robinson
80W–115L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Astrid Peterson
105W–86L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Angela Childers
80W–56L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Kathleen Stiffler
152W–161L career · 5 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Sandra Self
12W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Sherilyn Dlugolenski
85W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Shirley Pirkl
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.81
2.5
Catherine Wulfhorst
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Kerri Powell
49W–49L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.