Teams

Court Jesters Cerhan RAC

2025 USTA League Tennis Adult 40 & Over - RO · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-18vs Still Smashing Chalmers RACWon 32
L#1 DoublesLisa Teske / Amy Crockett vs Lixia Yang / Yuki Munden0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Magdalena Geske6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJessica Balcom / Pamela Thompson vs Mabel Ryder / Raelene Shufelt1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Colby / Kerry Kechely vs Eve Dieterman / Anne Thiemann1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJane Cerhan / Lihong He vs Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos / Heshan Liu6-2, 7-5
2025-05-04vs Still Smashing Chalmers RACLost 23
L#1 DoublesKerry Kechely / Anne Colby vs Sarah Bauer / Jessica Wang1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Mabel Ryder7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJodi Kruse / Jane Cerhan vs Lixia Yang / Yuki Munden0-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Teske / Jessica Balcom vs Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos / Raelene Shufelt6-1, 6-3
L#4 DoublesPamela Thompson / Alice Lembach vs Diana Kelm / Marina Walther-Antonio4-6, 2-6
2025-04-27vs Still Smashing Chalmers RACLost 23
L#1 DoublesJodi Kruse / Anne Colby vs Lixia Yang / Dawn Wildfeuer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Diana Kelm6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Chambers / Alice Lembach vs Jessica Wang / Heshan Liu1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJane Cerhan / Tracy Milligan vs Sarah Bauer / Yuki Munden3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesLihong He / Jessica Balcom vs Michelle Duchateau / Anne Thiemann6-3, 6-0
2025-04-13vs Still Smashing Chalmers RACLost 14
L#1 DoublesJodi Kruse / Anne Colby vs Dawn Wildfeuer / Lixia Yang6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLihong He vs Jessica Wang3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Chambers / Alice Lembach vs Heshan Liu / Sarah Bauer7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTracy Milligan / Pamela Thompson vs Eve Dieterman / Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesAmy Crockett / Jessica Balcom vs Michelle Duchateau / Marina Walther-Antonio6-3, 6-3
2025-03-30vs Still Smashing Chalmers RACWon 32
L#1 DoublesLisa Teske / Jane Cerhan vs Mabel Ryder / Lixia Yang0-5
W#1 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Sarah Chalmers6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Crockett / Kerry Kechely vs Heshan Liu / Jessica Wang2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlice Lembach / Sharon Chambers vs Anne Thiemann / Raelene Shufelt6-1, 6-3
W#4 DoublesPamela Thompson / Melanie Lyden vs Yuki Munden / Magdalena Geske4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-23vs Still Smashing Chalmers RACLost 23
W#1 DoublesJodi Kruse / Anne Colby vs Mabel Ryder / Julie Freidhoff6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Marina Walther-Antonio6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Teske / Amy Crockett vs Sarah Chalmers / Dawn Wildfeuer4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Chambers / Alice Lembach vs Heshan Liu / Jessica Wang5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Jessica Balcom vs Eve Dieterman / Anne Thiemann0-6, 4-6
2025-03-16vs Still Smashing Chalmers RACLost 14
L#1 DoublesJodi Kruse / Jane Cerhan vs Lixia Yang / Dawn Wildfeuer2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Sarah Bauer4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSharon Chambers / Anne Colby vs Jessica Wang / Heshan Liu6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Teske / Kathryn Palen vs Julie Freidhoff / Yuki Munden3-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesAlice Lembach / Lihong He vs Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos / Raelene Shufelt6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Jodi Kruse
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Anne Colby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Lihong He
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 38% · published
3.19
Alice Lembach
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Noiles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.08
Jane Cerhan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.06
Lisa Teske
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Melanie Lyden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Jessica Balcom
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Kathryn Palen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kerry Kechely
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Tracy Milligan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Kruse + Anne Colby5355% games+6.1% vs expected
Jane Cerhan + Jodi Kruse5547% games−5.7% vs expected
Alice Lembach + Sharon Chambers134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Cerhan + Lisa Teske224 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Lyden + Jessica Balcom224 matchesnot enough data
Alice Lembach + Lisa Teske213 matchesnot enough data
Anne Colby + Kerry Kechely213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jodi Kruse
32W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Anne Colby
14W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Lihong He
22W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Alice Lembach
7W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jennifer Noiles
24W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jane Cerhan
13W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Lisa Teske
13W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Melanie Lyden
30W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jessica Balcom
29W–26L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Kathryn Palen
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
Kerry Kechely
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Chambers
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Milligan
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.