Teams

Sharp/Bennett -Longview

2026 NETX Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-22vs Peterson -FaulknerLost 12
W#1 DoublesTheresa Reynolds / MaryBeth Reeves vs Kathy Lamb / Kathleen Lowdermilk6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiann Bennett / Phyllis Jolley Smith vs Melinda Ross / Jill Hamil0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKandy Wharton / Amelia Maxwell vs Cheryl Terry / Robin Carroll1-6, 1-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Reeda Taylor
published
Cynthia Horsley
published 3
2.73
Jennifer Gilmore
published
2.72
Clara Ross
published 3
2.68
Amelia Maxwell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Toni Sharp
published
2.47
Phyllis Jolley Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Diann Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kandy Wharton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Corpier
published
MaryBeth Reeves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Theresa Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Corpier + Reeda Taylor4351% gamesnot enough data
Diann Bennett + Phyllis Jolley Smith0628% gamesnot enough data
Diann Bennett + Amelia Maxwell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reeda Taylor
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Cynthia Horsley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Gilmore
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Clara Ross
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Amelia Maxwell
17W–19L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Toni Sharp
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Phyllis Jolley Smith
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Diann Bennett
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Kandy Wharton
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lori Corpier
11W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
MaryBeth Reeves
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Theresa Reynolds
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.