Teams

Acing Gracefully

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 8.0 - 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-18vs PearlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Bishop / Katie Bark vs Kimimi Ashley / Shelley Geiszler4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Nelson / Nancy Barber vs Sarah Miller / Margaret Moffatt0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPatti Oakes / Stacey Ziegler vs Sherrie Harris / Sue Clark4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesKatie Bark / Anna Bishop vs Lucy France / Elizabeth Brennan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathy Nelson / Nancy Unglaub vs Sherrie Fuller-Benge / Sherry Varner7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Wood / Annette Christie vs AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL / Mary Thane1-6, 5-7
2024-08-17vs PearlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatti Oakes / Anna Bishop vs Sherrie Harris / Sarah Miller4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Barber / Katie Bark vs Kimimi Ashley / Shelley Geiszler6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnnette Christie / Nancy Wood vs Kelly Shull / Margaret Moffatt6-3, 6-4
2024-08-17vs Balls on FireLost 12
W#1 DoublesStacey Ziegler / Patti Oakes vs Karen Vinton / Yao Bailey6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnnette Christie / Nancy Wood vs Susan Ward / Caroline Bennett3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Kathy Nelson vs Colleen Green / Jean Clary7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAnn Waters / Kathy Nelson vs Lucy France / Elizabeth Brennan6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Anna Bishop vs Sherrie Fuller-Benge / Christine Caldwell4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStacey Ziegler / Patti Oakes vs AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL / Mary Thane6-7, 3-6
2024-08-16vs Balls on FireWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Christie / Nancy Wood vs Caroline Bennett / Adrienne Dube6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Barber / Anna Bishop vs Colleen Green / Jean Clary4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Bark / Ann Waters vs Yao Bailey / Karen Vinton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-23vs PearlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Bark / Shelley Williams vs Willa Craig / Shelley Geiszler7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStacey Ziegler / Kathy Nelson vs Peggy Griffin / Kelly Shull6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Jan DeCosse vs Sarah Miller / Margaret Moffatt6-1, 7-6
2023-06-22vs PearlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Jan DeCosse vs Kelly Shull / Peggy Griffin6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShelley Williams / Katie Bark vs Sue Clark / Margaret Moffatt6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 - 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Ann Waters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Anna Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Annette Christie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Nancy Wood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Shelley Williams
published 4
3.40
Nancy Unglaub
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
2.88
Patti Oakes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jan DeCosse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy Nelson
published
Katie Bark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Barber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stacey Ziegler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Bishop + Nancy Unglaub5456% games−4.9% vs expected
Shelley Williams + Katie Bark5253% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Barber + Katie Bark3259% gamesnot enough data
Jan DeCosse + Nancy Unglaub5069% gamesnot enough data
Patti Oakes + Katie Bark134 matchesnot enough data
Annette Christie + Nancy Wood224 matchesnot enough data
Patti Oakes + Stacey Ziegler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Waters
25W–15L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Anna Bishop
110W–112L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Annette Christie
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Nancy Wood
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Shelley Williams
7W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Nancy Unglaub
120W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Patti Oakes
79W–191L career · 4 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Jan DeCosse
28W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Nelson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Bark
11W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Barber
40W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacey Ziegler
23W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.