Teams

DRusnak 2.5S

2022 Capital Fall 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-10-26vs KKnoblauchWon 20
W#2 SinglesAshley Lindeman vs Meta Bartley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Amy Cantando6-1, 6-0
2022-10-19vs SCookeWon 30
W#1 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Sarah Cooke6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Jessica Jones6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Lauren Daigle6-2, 7-6
2022-10-12Won 30
W#1 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAshley Lindeman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-05vs KKnoblauchLost 02
L#2 SinglesAshley Lindeman vs Kari Knoblauch2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Nicole Masters6-7, 2-6
2022-09-28vs SCookeWon 20
W#2 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Lauren Daigle7-6, 7-5
W#3 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Mollie Weimer2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-21vs JMerta singlesWon 20
W#1 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Jean Merta3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-14vs KKnoblauchLost 01
L#1 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Kari Knoblauch7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-09-12Won 10
W#3 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Jessica Jones6-3, 6-3
2022-09-05vs JMerta singlesLost 01
L#1 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Jean Merta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-29Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Meta Bartley5-7, 4-6
2022-08-17vs SCookeWon 20
W#1 SinglesJade Paunovich vs Cara Pierce6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Courtney Britt6-4, 6-1
2022-08-10vs JMerta singlesLost 01
L#3 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Abigail Douek2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Amy Cagle
published 3
2.71
Jade Paunovich
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.67
Ashley Lindeman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Natalie Norris
published
2.54
Dawn Rusnak
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.40
Brittany Shumaker
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Rusnak + Jade Paunovich6549% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Lindeman + Brittany Shumaker5454% gamesnot enough data
Jade Paunovich + Brittany Shumaker1631% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Lindeman + Natalie Norris0532% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Cagle
17W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Jade Paunovich
85W–180L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Ashley Lindeman
45W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.67
Natalie Norris
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Dawn Rusnak
134W–126L career · 6 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Brittany Shumaker
46W–81L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.